2016Campus Legal AdvisorRequires access

Fisher ruling requires buy‐in, thorough assessment of diversity, affirmative action

Michael E. Porter, Erica Clausen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Student‐body diversity is critically important to many institutions, and the U.S. Supreme Court has again ruled that diversity is critical enough in legal terms to be a “compelling government interest” and that certain forms of affirmative action to increase student‐body diversity can be constitutional.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Student‐body diversity is critically important to many institutions, and the U.S. Supreme Court has again ruled that diversity is critical enough in legal terms to be a “compelling government interest” and that certain forms of affirmative action to increase student‐body diversity can be constitutional.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Student‐body diversity is critically important to many institutions, and the U.S. Supreme Court has again ruled that diversity is critical enough in legal terms to be a “compelling government interest” and that certain forms of affirmative action to increase student‐body diversity can be constitutional.

Key concepts: Affirmative action, Diversity (politics), Supreme court, Government (linguistics), Action (physics), Political science, Law, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fisher ruling requires buy‐in, thorough assessment of diversity, affirmative action — Research Paper | ScholarLens