Fisher ruling requires buy‐in, thorough assessment of diversity, affirmative action
Michael E. Porter, Erica Clausen
Abstract
Michael E. Porter, Erica Clausen
Abstract
Student‐body diversity is critically important to many institutions, and the U.S. Supreme Court has again ruled that diversity is critical enough in legal terms to be a “compelling government interest” and that certain forms of affirmative action to increase student‐body diversity can be constitutional.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Student‐body diversity is critically important to many institutions, and the U.S. Supreme Court has again ruled that diversity is critical enough in legal terms to be a “compelling government interest” and that certain forms of affirmative action to increase student‐body diversity can be constitutional.
Key concepts: Affirmative action, Diversity (politics), Supreme court, Government (linguistics), Action (physics), Political science, Law, Law and economics