2002Educational and Child PsychologyRequires access

Dyslexia in evidence-based practice

Rea Reason, Kevin Woods

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article starts with a formulation of evidence-based practice relevant to the concept of dyslexia. It then discusses responses to a survey of the impact of the DECP report entitledDyslexia, Literacy and Psychological Assessment(BPS/DECP, 1999b) under the following headings: applying the working definition of dyslexia; evidence of dyslexia and evidence of special educational needs; values and evidence; assessment-through-teaching as evidence; dissemination of evidence. The article stresses the importance of practitioner research and collaborative enquiry in answering the ‘so what?’ questions of dyslexia. It recognises that evidence-based practice does not exist in a vacuum devoid of the influences of publicity and public opinion, the beliefs and values in society (and of the practitioners themselves) and the legal precedents set in court.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This article starts with a formulation of evidence-based practice relevant to the concept of dyslexia. It then discusses responses to a survey of the impact of the DECP report entitledDyslexia, Literacy and Psychological Assessment(BPS/DECP, 1999b) under the following headings: applying the working definition of dyslexia; evidence of dyslexia and evidence of special educational needs; values and evidence; assessment-through-teaching as evidence; dissemination of evidence. The article stresses the importance of practitioner research and collaborative enquiry in answering the ‘so what?’ questions of dyslexia. It recognises that evidence-based practice does not exist in a vacuum devoid of the influences of publicity and public opinion, the beliefs and values in society (and of the practitioners themselves) and the legal precedents set in court.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This article starts with a formulation of evidence-based practice relevant to the concept of dyslexia. It then discusses responses to a survey of the impact of the DECP report entitledDyslexia, Literacy and Psychological Assessment(BPS/DECP, 1999b) under the following headings: applying the working definition of dyslexia; evidence of dyslexia and evidence of special educational needs; values and evidence; assessment-through-teaching as evidence; dissemination of evidence. The article stresses the importance of practitioner research and collaborative enquiry in answering the ‘so what?’ questions of dyslexia. It recognises that evidence-based practice does not exist in a vacuum devoid of the influences of publicity and public opinion, the beliefs and values in society (and of the practitioners themselves) and the legal precedents set in court.

Key concepts: Dyslexia, Publicity, Psychology, Set (abstract data type), Evidence-based practice, Literacy, Cognitive psychology, Reading (process)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dyslexia in evidence-based practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens