2015The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal CommunicationRequires access

Self‐Construals and Social Interaction

Min‐Sun Kim

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract It has been proffered that independent and interdependent construals of self are one of the most prominent self‐schemata for distinguishing culture. Those with independent self‐construals see themselves as distinct, autonomous individuals with unique internal attributes, while those with interdependent self‐construals view themselves in the context of being woven inextricably within significant social relationships. Cultures and individuals can balance and develop each of these orientations in many different ways. Self‐construals are conducive in formulating views of the self‐concept that include the newer ideas of multiple or hybrid identities. Applied in social interaction, self‐construals seem to determine the degree of direct and indirect communication styles in various communication settings as well as the flexibility in various conversational strategy choices across different cultural settings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract It has been proffered that independent and interdependent construals of self are one of the most prominent self‐schemata for distinguishing culture. Those with independent self‐construals see themselves as distinct, autonomous individuals with unique internal attributes, while those with interdependent self‐construals view themselves in the context of being woven inextricably within significant social relationships. Cultures and individuals can balance and develop each of these orientations in many different ways. Self‐construals are conducive in formulating views of the self‐concept that include the newer ideas of multiple or hybrid identities. Applied in social interaction, self‐construals seem to determine the degree of direct and indirect communication styles in various communication settings as well as the flexibility in various conversational strategy choices across different cultural settings.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract It has been proffered that independent and interdependent construals of self are one of the most prominent self‐schemata for distinguishing culture. Those with independent self‐construals see themselves as distinct, autonomous individuals with unique internal attributes, while those with interdependent self‐construals view themselves in the context of being woven inextricably within significant social relationships. Cultures and individuals can balance and develop each of these orientations in many different ways. Self‐construals are conducive in formulating views of the self‐concept that include the newer ideas of multiple or hybrid identities. Applied in social interaction, self‐construals seem to determine the degree of direct and indirect communication styles in various communication settings as well as the flexibility in various conversational strategy choices across different cultural settings.

Key concepts: Construals, Self construal, Interdependence, Social psychology, Psychology, Context (archaeology), Flexibility (engineering), Cognitive psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Self‐Construals and Social Interaction — Research Paper | ScholarLens