2007•Unpublished venueRequires access

A cross-cultural comparison of behaviors and independent/interdependent self-views

Kosuke null Takemura, Masaki Yuki, Emiko S. Kashima, Michael J. Halloran

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This study examined whether self-reports on general self-views and on own behaviors would show the same cross-cultural differences in cultural self-construal. We asked Japanese, Australian, and Canadian university students to complete an independent and interdependent cultural self-construal scale and, a week later, to rate their past behaviors. The results showed that Japanese endorsed more interdependent behaviors than Westerners, consistent with the cultural self-construal hypothesis (Markus & Kitayama, 1991). In contrast, on the self-construal scales, Japanese were no more interdependent than Westerners, although Japanese were less independent than Westerners. It was also found that the behavioral ratings and self-construal assessments were correlated with each other in the logically predicted directions within each culture. Possible reasons for the inconsistent findings on the two measures of self are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examined whether self-reports on general self-views and on own behaviors would show the same cross-cultural differences in cultural self-construal. We asked Japanese, Australian, and Canadian university students to complete an independent and interdependent cultural self-construal scale and, a week later, to rate their past behaviors. The results showed that Japanese endorsed more interdependent behaviors than Westerners, consistent with the cultural self-construal hypothesis (Markus & Kitayama, 1991). In contrast, on the self-construal scales, Japanese were no more interdependent than Westerners, although Japanese were less independent than Westerners. It was also found that the behavioral ratings and self-construal assessments were correlated with each other in the logically predicted directions within each culture. Possible reasons for the inconsistent findings on the two measures of self are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examined whether self-reports on general self-views and on own behaviors would show the same cross-cultural differences in cultural self-construal. We asked Japanese, Australian, and Canadian university students to complete an independent and interdependent cultural self-construal scale and, a week later, to rate their past behaviors. The results showed that Japanese endorsed more interdependent behaviors than Westerners, consistent with the cultural self-construal hypothesis (Markus & Kitayama, 1991). In contrast, on the self-construal scales, Japanese were no more interdependent than Westerners, although Japanese were less independent than Westerners. It was also found that the behavioral ratings and self-construal assessments were correlated with each other in the logically predicted directions within each culture. Possible reasons for the inconsistent findings on the two measures of self are discussed.

Key concepts: Interdependence, Self construal, Social psychology, Psychology, Construal level theory, Cross-cultural studies, Cross-cultural, Scale (ratio)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A cross-cultural comparison of behaviors and independent/interdependent self-views — Research Paper | ScholarLens