ScholarLens Back to search
2016•OncotargetOpen access

Prognostic value of microRNA-9 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Han Sun, Yingjie Shao, Jin Huang, Siwei Sun, Yijie Liu, Pinghui Zhou, Huilin Yang

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

// Han Sun 1, * , Yingjie Shao 2, * , Jin Huang 2 , Siwei Sun 1 , Yijie Liu 1 , Pinghui Zhou 1 , Huilin Yang 1 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, P.R. China 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, P.R. China * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Huilin Yang, email: yanghlsz@163.com Keywords: miR-9, cancer, prognosis, systematic review, meta-analysis Received: January 06, 2016 Accepted: August 08, 2016 Published: August 22, 2016 ABSTRACT Recent studies revealed that different microRNA-9 (miR-9) expressions were associated with prognoses of different cancers. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of miR-9. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (last update by November 30, 2015) were searched for literatures. A total of 17 studies from 16 articles were finally qualified and enrolled in this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that a higher expression of miR-9 might predict poor overall survival (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.39 – 3.41, P < 0.001 (7.23 * 10 -4 )), disease-free survival (HR: 5.22, 95% CI: 2.17 – 12.53, P < 0.001 (2.21 * 10 -4 )), and recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.32 – 1.85, P < 0.001 (1.80*10 -7 )) in various carcinomas. However, results of subgroup analyses revealed that down-regulated miR-9 was associated with poor overall survival (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28 – 0.73, P < 0.001 (1.13*10 -3 )) and progress-free survival (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34 – 0.62, P < 0.001 (5.03*10 -7 )) in ovarian cancer patients. By subgroup analyses we also found that sample collecting time and patients’ origin had little influence on the result of OS. These results indicate that in most cancer types the highly expressed miR-9 is associated with poor survival of patients, whereas the down-regulated miR-9 may predict poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

// Han Sun 1, * , Yingjie Shao 2, * , Jin Huang 2 , Siwei Sun 1 , Yijie Liu 1 , Pinghui Zhou 1 , Huilin Yang 1 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, P.R. China 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, P.R. China * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Huilin Yang, email: yanghlsz@163.com Keywords: miR-9, cancer, prognosis, systematic review, meta-analysis Received: January 06, 2016 Accepted: August 08, 2016 Published: August 22, 2016 ABSTRACT Recent studies revealed that different microRNA-9 (miR-9) expressions were associated with prognoses of different cancers. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of miR-9. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (last update by November 30, 2015) were searched for literatures. A total of 17 studies from 16 articles were finally qualified and enrolled in this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that a higher expression of miR-9 might predict poor overall survival (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.39 – 3.41, P < 0.001 (7.23 * 10 -4 )), disease-free survival (HR: 5.22, 95% CI: 2.17 – 12.53, P < 0.001 (2.21 * 10 -4 )), and recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.32 – 1.85, P < 0.001 (1.80*10 -7 )) in various carcinomas. However, results of subgroup analyses revealed that down-regulated miR-9 was associated with poor overall survival (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28 – 0.73, P < 0.001 (1.13*10 -3 )) and progress-free survival (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34 – 0.62, P < 0.001 (5.03*10 -7 )) in ovarian cancer patients. By subgroup analyses we also found that sample collecting time and patients’ origin had little influence on the result of OS. These results indicate that in most cancer types the highly expressed miR-9 is associated with poor survival of patients, whereas the down-regulated miR-9 may predict poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

// Han Sun 1, * , Yingjie Shao 2, * , Jin Huang 2 , Siwei Sun 1 , Yijie Liu 1 , Pinghui Zhou 1 , Huilin Yang 1 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, P.R. China 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, P.R. China * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Huilin Yang, email: yanghlsz@163.com Keywords: miR-9, cancer, prognosis, systematic review, meta-analysis Received: January 06, 2016 Accepted: August 08, 2016 Published: August 22, 2016 ABSTRACT Recent studies revealed that different microRNA-9 (miR-9) expressions were associated with prognoses of different cancers. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of miR-9. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (last update by November 30, 2015) were searched for literatures. A total of 17 studies from 16 articles were finally qualified and enrolled in this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that a higher expression of miR-9 might predict poor overall survival (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.39 – 3.41, P < 0.001 (7.23 * 10 -4 )), disease-free survival (HR: 5.22, 95% CI: 2.17 – 12.53, P < 0.001 (2.21 * 10 -4 )), and recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.32 – 1.85, P < 0.001 (1.80*10 -7 )) in various carcinomas. However, results of subgroup analyses revealed that down-regulated miR-9 was associated with poor overall survival (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28 – 0.73, P < 0.001 (1.13*10 -3 )) and progress-free survival (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34 – 0.62, P < 0.001 (5.03*10 -7 )) in ovarian cancer patients. By subgroup analyses we also found that sample collecting time and patients’ origin had little influence on the result of OS. These results indicate that in most cancer types the highly expressed miR-9 is associated with poor survival of patients, whereas the down-regulated miR-9 may predict poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal medicine, Meta-analysis, Subgroup analysis, Oncology, Ovarian cancer, Cochrane Library, Cancer

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prognostic value of microRNA-9 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens