The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Weiwei Yang, Xiongbin Cao, Xiaoyun Zhang, Xuebin Wang, Xiaowen Li, Yaping Huai
Abstract
Open-access reader
Weiwei Yang, Xiongbin Cao, Xiaoyun Zhang, Xuebin Wang, Xiaowen Li, Yaping Huai
Abstract
Open-access reader
Objective: The primary purpose of our study is to systemically evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on recovery of dysphagia after stroke. Search Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published by PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 24, 2021. Language is limited to English. After screening and extracting the data, and evaluating the quality of the selected literature, we carried out the meta-analysis with software RevMan 5.3 and summarized available evidence from non-RCTs. Results: Among 205 potentially relevant articles, 189 participants (from 10 RCTs) were recruited in the meta-analysis, and six non-RCTs were qualitatively described. The random-effects model analysis revealed a pooled effect size of SMD = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.04–1.26, p = 0.04), which indicated that rTMS therapy has a better effect than conventional therapy. However, the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between low-frequency and high-frequency groups. Even more surprisingly, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups and the conventional training group in the subgroup analysis, but the combined effect was positive. Conclusion: Our study suggests that rTMS might be effective in treating patients with dysphagia after stroke.
OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: The primary purpose of our study is to systemically evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on recovery of dysphagia after stroke. Search Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published by PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 24, 2021. Language is limited to English. After screening and extracting the data, and evaluating the quality of the selected literature, we carried out the meta-analysis with software RevMan 5.3 and summarized available evidence from non-RCTs. Results: Among 205 potentially relevant articles, 189 participants (from 10 RCTs) were recruited in the meta-analysis, and six non-RCTs were qualitatively described. The random-effects model analysis revealed a pooled effect size of SMD = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.04–1.26, p = 0.04), which indicated that rTMS therapy has a better effect than conventional therapy. However, the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between low-frequency and high-frequency groups. Even more surprisingly, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups and the conventional training group in the subgroup analysis, but the combined effect was positive. Conclusion: Our study suggests that rTMS might be effective in treating patients with dysphagia after stroke.
Key concepts: Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, Randomized controlled trial, Subgroup analysis, Medicine, Dysphagia, Stroke (engine)