2021Frontiers in NeuroscienceOpen access

The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Weiwei Yang, Xiongbin Cao, Xiaoyun Zhang, Xuebin Wang, Xiaowen Li, Yaping Huai

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

Objective: The primary purpose of our study is to systemically evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on recovery of dysphagia after stroke. Search Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published by PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 24, 2021. Language is limited to English. After screening and extracting the data, and evaluating the quality of the selected literature, we carried out the meta-analysis with software RevMan 5.3 and summarized available evidence from non-RCTs. Results: Among 205 potentially relevant articles, 189 participants (from 10 RCTs) were recruited in the meta-analysis, and six non-RCTs were qualitatively described. The random-effects model analysis revealed a pooled effect size of SMD = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.04–1.26, p = 0.04), which indicated that rTMS therapy has a better effect than conventional therapy. However, the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between low-frequency and high-frequency groups. Even more surprisingly, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups and the conventional training group in the subgroup analysis, but the combined effect was positive. Conclusion: Our study suggests that rTMS might be effective in treating patients with dysphagia after stroke.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: The primary purpose of our study is to systemically evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on recovery of dysphagia after stroke. Search Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published by PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 24, 2021. Language is limited to English. After screening and extracting the data, and evaluating the quality of the selected literature, we carried out the meta-analysis with software RevMan 5.3 and summarized available evidence from non-RCTs. Results: Among 205 potentially relevant articles, 189 participants (from 10 RCTs) were recruited in the meta-analysis, and six non-RCTs were qualitatively described. The random-effects model analysis revealed a pooled effect size of SMD = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.04–1.26, p = 0.04), which indicated that rTMS therapy has a better effect than conventional therapy. However, the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between low-frequency and high-frequency groups. Even more surprisingly, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups and the conventional training group in the subgroup analysis, but the combined effect was positive. Conclusion: Our study suggests that rTMS might be effective in treating patients with dysphagia after stroke.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: The primary purpose of our study is to systemically evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on recovery of dysphagia after stroke. Search Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published by PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 24, 2021. Language is limited to English. After screening and extracting the data, and evaluating the quality of the selected literature, we carried out the meta-analysis with software RevMan 5.3 and summarized available evidence from non-RCTs. Results: Among 205 potentially relevant articles, 189 participants (from 10 RCTs) were recruited in the meta-analysis, and six non-RCTs were qualitatively described. The random-effects model analysis revealed a pooled effect size of SMD = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.04–1.26, p = 0.04), which indicated that rTMS therapy has a better effect than conventional therapy. However, the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between low-frequency and high-frequency groups. Even more surprisingly, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups and the conventional training group in the subgroup analysis, but the combined effect was positive. Conclusion: Our study suggests that rTMS might be effective in treating patients with dysphagia after stroke.

Key concepts: Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, Randomized controlled trial, Subgroup analysis, Medicine, Dysphagia, Stroke (engine)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens