2013Yale University Press eBooksRequires access

The Occult Contested

Paul Monod

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter presents the polarizing reactions to occult thinking—while some considered it a legitimate source of knowledge, others saw it as diabolical and taboo—and shows how prophecy that drew on occult sources suffered anathematization by established authorities. The discussion of occult philosophy in the late seventeenth century was muddled, and the occult was erroneously presented as a defining feature of witchcraft. Witchcraft, although tangential to occult beliefs, became a tool that was frequently used to disparage occult philosophy. It is argued here, however, that one could deny witchcraft and believe in occult philosophy, and vice versa. The final sections of the chapter discuss the attempts of scientific thinkers in testing occult claims and the pursuit of hidden knowledge or secrets.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter presents the polarizing reactions to occult thinking—while some considered it a legitimate source of knowledge, others saw it as diabolical and taboo—and shows how prophecy that drew on occult sources suffered anathematization by established authorities. The discussion of occult philosophy in the late seventeenth century was muddled, and the occult was erroneously presented as a defining feature of witchcraft. Witchcraft, although tangential to occult beliefs, became a tool that was frequently used to disparage occult philosophy. It is argued here, however, that one could deny witchcraft and believe in occult philosophy, and vice versa. The final sections of the chapter discuss the attempts of scientific thinkers in testing occult claims and the pursuit of hidden knowledge or secrets.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter presents the polarizing reactions to occult thinking—while some considered it a legitimate source of knowledge, others saw it as diabolical and taboo—and shows how prophecy that drew on occult sources suffered anathematization by established authorities. The discussion of occult philosophy in the late seventeenth century was muddled, and the occult was erroneously presented as a defining feature of witchcraft. Witchcraft, although tangential to occult beliefs, became a tool that was frequently used to disparage occult philosophy. It is argued here, however, that one could deny witchcraft and believe in occult philosophy, and vice versa. The final sections of the chapter discuss the attempts of scientific thinkers in testing occult claims and the pursuit of hidden knowledge or secrets.

Key concepts: Occult, Taboo, Epistemology, Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Medicine, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Occult Contested — Research Paper | ScholarLens