2006Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

O Sister Swallow: Sapphic Fragments as English Literature in Virginia Woolf

Anne Fernald

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the feminist pamphlet Three Guineas (1938), Woolf linked gender and citizenship, writing, “As a woman, I have no country” (3G, 109). Today, we hear in that phrase not only a refusal of nationalism-as-patriotism, but also a gesture toward a new global citizenship, which is differently constituted to welcome women and is imagined in opposition to mainline nationalism. For some time critics have made this into Woolf’s most important statement on nationalism.1 They have emphasized the link Woolf makes between the resistance of antifascist women and Antigone’s refusal to obey Creon. But this progressive, antipatriarchal sense of the legacy of Greek literature was not always Woolf’s. Early in her career, she acceded to the bourgeois habit of using her knowledge of Greek as cultural capital. Aware that few women knew Greek, she willingly distances herself from working women in order to forge an alliance with educated men, a gesture she explicitly repudiates in Three Guineas. At the same time, her female tutors introduced her to a counterhistory of Greek heroines while providing a living model of how the discipline of Greek can be open to all. To explore how Woolf went from this bifurcated but otherwise conventional bourgeois Victorian idea of the classics to the antinational vision of Antigone in Three Guineas, this chapter takes a close look at major texts from the mid-1920s: Mrs. Dalloway (1925), To the Lighthouse (1927), and the essay “On Not Knowing Greek” from The Common Reader (1925).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the feminist pamphlet Three Guineas (1938), Woolf linked gender and citizenship, writing, “As a woman, I have no country” (3G, 109). Today, we hear in that phrase not only a refusal of nationalism-as-patriotism, but also a gesture toward a new global citizenship, which is differently constituted to welcome women and is imagined in opposition to mainline nationalism. For some time critics have made this into Woolf’s most important statement on nationalism.1 They have emphasized the link Woolf makes between the resistance of antifascist women and Antigone’s refusal to obey Creon. But this progressive, antipatriarchal sense of the legacy of Greek literature was not always Woolf’s. Early in her career, she acceded to the bourgeois habit of using her knowledge of Greek as cultural capital. Aware that few women knew Greek, she willingly distances herself from working women in order to forge an alliance with educated men, a gesture she explicitly repudiates in Three Guineas. At the same time, her female tutors introduced her to a counterhistory of Greek heroines while providing a living model of how the discipline of Greek can be open to all. To explore how Woolf went from this bifurcated but otherwise conventional bourgeois Victorian idea of the classics to the antinational vision of Antigone in Three Guineas, this chapter takes a close look at major texts from the mid-1920s: Mrs. Dalloway (1925), To the Lighthouse (1927), and the essay “On Not Knowing Greek” from The Common Reader (1925).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the feminist pamphlet Three Guineas (1938), Woolf linked gender and citizenship, writing, “As a woman, I have no country” (3G, 109). Today, we hear in that phrase not only a refusal of nationalism-as-patriotism, but also a gesture toward a new global citizenship, which is differently constituted to welcome women and is imagined in opposition to mainline nationalism. For some time critics have made this into Woolf’s most important statement on nationalism.1 They have emphasized the link Woolf makes between the resistance of antifascist women and Antigone’s refusal to obey Creon. But this progressive, antipatriarchal sense of the legacy of Greek literature was not always Woolf’s. Early in her career, she acceded to the bourgeois habit of using her knowledge of Greek as cultural capital. Aware that few women knew Greek, she willingly distances herself from working women in order to forge an alliance with educated men, a gesture she explicitly repudiates in Three Guineas. At the same time, her female tutors introduced her to a counterhistory of Greek heroines while providing a living model of how the discipline of Greek can be open to all. To explore how Woolf went from this bifurcated but otherwise conventional bourgeois Victorian idea of the classics to the antinational vision of Antigone in Three Guineas, this chapter takes a close look at major texts from the mid-1920s: Mrs. Dalloway (1925), To the Lighthouse (1927), and the essay “On Not Knowing Greek” from The Common Reader (1925).

Key concepts: Nationalism, Bourgeoisie, Literature, Opposition (politics), Patriotism, Sister, Art, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
O Sister Swallow: Sapphic Fragments as English Literature in Virginia Woolf — Research Paper | ScholarLens