1998•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

The Institutional Foundations of the New Sovereignty

Kurt Mills

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the previous chapters I have made two related arguments about the evolving balance between human rights and state sovereignty. From a normative perspective I have argued that sovereignty includes an obligation to uphold basic human rights, popular sovereignty and self-determination. In practice, the international community has taken a wide variety of actions, however ambiguous, which indicate a shift in the balance between sovereignty and human rights. Yet, there is still a great disjunction between humanitarian needs worldwide and the international institutional capacity and the will to deal with these needs. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the previous chapters I have made two related arguments about the evolving balance between human rights and state sovereignty. From a normative perspective I have argued that sovereignty includes an obligation to uphold basic human rights, popular sovereignty and self-determination. In practice, the international community has taken a wide variety of actions, however ambiguous, which indicate a shift in the balance between sovereignty and human rights. Yet, there is still a great disjunction between humanitarian needs worldwide and the international institutional capacity and the will to deal with these needs. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the previous chapters I have made two related arguments about the evolving balance between human rights and state sovereignty. From a normative perspective I have argued that sovereignty includes an obligation to uphold basic human rights, popular sovereignty and self-determination. In practice, the international community has taken a wide variety of actions, however ambiguous, which indicate a shift in the balance between sovereignty and human rights. Yet, there is still a great disjunction between humanitarian needs worldwide and the international institutional capacity and the will to deal with these needs. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Sovereignty, Human rights, Normative, Balance (ability), Obligation, Political science, Variety (cybernetics), Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Institutional Foundations of the New Sovereignty — Research Paper | ScholarLens