2008Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

No Child Left Behind Litigation

Benjamin Michael Superfine

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the litigation generated directly in response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and focuses on the ways in which courts have addressed NCLB-related claims. It considers case studies of NCLB-related litigation in three major areas: the implementation of NCLB accountability sanctions, the justifiability of student and school performance determinations, and the underlying capacities possessed by various entities to respond to NCLB requirements. In these cases, the courts generally have not been willing to order changes in NCLB's implementation, and the relevant legal frameworks have poorly framed many of the problems facing standards-based reform and accountability policies. Accordingly, several key issues surrounding NCLB's design and implementation have largely remained hidden from judicial analysis, and some major problems facing NCLB that have arisen in the course of litigation have involved issues that courts are not well positioned to address, such as technical aspects of testing systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the litigation generated directly in response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and focuses on the ways in which courts have addressed NCLB-related claims. It considers case studies of NCLB-related litigation in three major areas: the implementation of NCLB accountability sanctions, the justifiability of student and school performance determinations, and the underlying capacities possessed by various entities to respond to NCLB requirements. In these cases, the courts generally have not been willing to order changes in NCLB's implementation, and the relevant legal frameworks have poorly framed many of the problems facing standards-based reform and accountability policies. Accordingly, several key issues surrounding NCLB's design and implementation have largely remained hidden from judicial analysis, and some major problems facing NCLB that have arisen in the course of litigation have involved issues that courts are not well positioned to address, such as technical aspects of testing systems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the litigation generated directly in response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and focuses on the ways in which courts have addressed NCLB-related claims. It considers case studies of NCLB-related litigation in three major areas: the implementation of NCLB accountability sanctions, the justifiability of student and school performance determinations, and the underlying capacities possessed by various entities to respond to NCLB requirements. In these cases, the courts generally have not been willing to order changes in NCLB's implementation, and the relevant legal frameworks have poorly framed many of the problems facing standards-based reform and accountability policies. Accordingly, several key issues surrounding NCLB's design and implementation have largely remained hidden from judicial analysis, and some major problems facing NCLB that have arisen in the course of litigation have involved issues that courts are not well positioned to address, such as technical aspects of testing systems.

Key concepts: Sanctions, Accountability, No child left behind, Political science, Order (exchange), Law and economics, Public administration, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
No Child Left Behind Litigation — Research Paper | ScholarLens