2013Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

The Psychology of Authority

Michael Huemer

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this chapter, I review some evidence from psychology and history, both about the attitudes and behavior of those who are subject to others’ (alleged) authority and about the attitudes and behavior of those who are in positions of authority. These findings are fascinating in their own right. They also bear, in at least two important ways, on the skepticism about political authority defended in this book. For one thing, psychological data bear on the question of how much trust we should place in our intuitions about authority. For another, psychological data bear on the question of how desirable or harmful it may be to encourage skepticism about authority. In the present chapter, when I speak of ‘authorities’ and ‘authority figures’, I mean people and institutions that are socially recognized as having authority, whether or not they have genuine authority in a normative sense. ‘Positions of authority’ and ‘institutions of authority’ should be understood similarly. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this chapter, I review some evidence from psychology and history, both about the attitudes and behavior of those who are subject to others’ (alleged) authority and about the attitudes and behavior of those who are in positions of authority. These findings are fascinating in their own right. They also bear, in at least two important ways, on the skepticism about political authority defended in this book. For one thing, psychological data bear on the question of how much trust we should place in our intuitions about authority. For another, psychological data bear on the question of how desirable or harmful it may be to encourage skepticism about authority. In the present chapter, when I speak of ‘authorities’ and ‘authority figures’, I mean people and institutions that are socially recognized as having authority, whether or not they have genuine authority in a normative sense. ‘Positions of authority’ and ‘institutions of authority’ should be understood similarly. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this chapter, I review some evidence from psychology and history, both about the attitudes and behavior of those who are subject to others’ (alleged) authority and about the attitudes and behavior of those who are in positions of authority. These findings are fascinating in their own right. They also bear, in at least two important ways, on the skepticism about political authority defended in this book. For one thing, psychological data bear on the question of how much trust we should place in our intuitions about authority. For another, psychological data bear on the question of how desirable or harmful it may be to encourage skepticism about authority. In the present chapter, when I speak of ‘authorities’ and ‘authority figures’, I mean people and institutions that are socially recognized as having authority, whether or not they have genuine authority in a normative sense. ‘Positions of authority’ and ‘institutions of authority’ should be understood similarly. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Political authority, Skepticism, Primary authority, Normative, Moral authority, Public authority, Subject (documents), Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Psychology of Authority — Research Paper | ScholarLens