2013Unpublished venueRequires access

“Every Inch a King”. Kings and Kingship in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds

Lynette Mitchell, Charles Melville

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

The chapters in this book focus on legitimacy, propaganda and political ideology issues and reveal how they interrelate-so that kingship is shown to be a nexus of ideas and representations which connect earthly concerns of legitimacy and power with the larger concerns of man's place in the cosmos. The book emphasises the centrality of the Middle Eastern and Iranian perspective on kingship, which so often is ignored or incidental in comparative studies of this nature, as also stresses the continuities between the ancient and medieval worlds, generally treated separately. Kingship was concerned with constraint of the ruler, and the consent of the ruled. In the late medieval period this relationship between ruler and ruled had been imagined in various ways. The late sixteenth-century French political philosopher, Jean Bodin, developed the theory of the divine right of kings in order to justify the king’s absolute authority. Keywords:ancient world; kingship; medieval world

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The chapters in this book focus on legitimacy, propaganda and political ideology issues and reveal how they interrelate-so that kingship is shown to be a nexus of ideas and representations which connect earthly concerns of legitimacy and power with the larger concerns of man's place in the cosmos. The book emphasises the centrality of the Middle Eastern and Iranian perspective on kingship, which so often is ignored or incidental in comparative studies of this nature, as also stresses the continuities between the ancient and medieval worlds, generally treated separately. Kingship was concerned with constraint of the ruler, and the consent of the ruled. In the late medieval period this relationship between ruler and ruled had been imagined in various ways. The late sixteenth-century French political philosopher, Jean Bodin, developed the theory of the divine right of kings in order to justify the king’s absolute authority. Keywords:ancient world; kingship; medieval world

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The chapters in this book focus on legitimacy, propaganda and political ideology issues and reveal how they interrelate-so that kingship is shown to be a nexus of ideas and representations which connect earthly concerns of legitimacy and power with the larger concerns of man's place in the cosmos. The book emphasises the centrality of the Middle Eastern and Iranian perspective on kingship, which so often is ignored or incidental in comparative studies of this nature, as also stresses the continuities between the ancient and medieval worlds, generally treated separately. Kingship was concerned with constraint of the ruler, and the consent of the ruled. In the late medieval period this relationship between ruler and ruled had been imagined in various ways. The late sixteenth-century French political philosopher, Jean Bodin, developed the theory of the divine right of kings in order to justify the king’s absolute authority. Keywords:ancient world; kingship; medieval world

Key concepts: Monarchy, Legitimacy, Ruler, Middle Ages, Politics, Ideology, Classics, Absolute monarchy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Every Inch a King”. Kings and Kingship in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds — Research Paper | ScholarLens