1976Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

French Kingship and Absolute Monarchy in the Seventeenth Century

François Dumont

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

It is generally accepted that, from the seventeenth century onward, monarchical power in France was absolute, contrasting with earlier ideas of kingship. But in fact it seems more likely that the earlier conception of kingship, which we may call traditional, remained alive and opposed to absolutism throughout the seventeenth century. This ambivalence in the interpretation of royal power aroused the passions of contemporaries: it was generally agreed that kingship was necessary, and even holy, but the growth of absolutism was not readily accepted. Seventeenth-century men often preferred to think that the growth of absolutism was not the work of the king himself, but of ministers or officials who exercised in his name a power whose limits they exceeded.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is generally accepted that, from the seventeenth century onward, monarchical power in France was absolute, contrasting with earlier ideas of kingship. But in fact it seems more likely that the earlier conception of kingship, which we may call traditional, remained alive and opposed to absolutism throughout the seventeenth century. This ambivalence in the interpretation of royal power aroused the passions of contemporaries: it was generally agreed that kingship was necessary, and even holy, but the growth of absolutism was not readily accepted. Seventeenth-century men often preferred to think that the growth of absolutism was not the work of the king himself, but of ministers or officials who exercised in his name a power whose limits they exceeded.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is generally accepted that, from the seventeenth century onward, monarchical power in France was absolute, contrasting with earlier ideas of kingship. But in fact it seems more likely that the earlier conception of kingship, which we may call traditional, remained alive and opposed to absolutism throughout the seventeenth century. This ambivalence in the interpretation of royal power aroused the passions of contemporaries: it was generally agreed that kingship was necessary, and even holy, but the growth of absolutism was not readily accepted. Seventeenth-century men often preferred to think that the growth of absolutism was not the work of the king himself, but of ministers or officials who exercised in his name a power whose limits they exceeded.

Key concepts: Absolute monarchy, Monarchy, Passions, Interpretation (philosophy), Power (physics), Coronation, Absolute (philosophy), Middle Ages

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
French Kingship and Absolute Monarchy in the Seventeenth Century — Research Paper | ScholarLens