1998Unpublished venueRequires access

Some recommendations for improvements to ASHRAE Standard 84-1991

D.L. Ciepliski, Carey J. Simonson, Robert W. Besant

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Rising energy costs and environmental concerns have raised interest in energy conservation, particularly energy recovery from ventilation exhaust air from buildings. Heating and cooling ventilation air often account for 20% to 40% of the total heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) energy used in commercial buildings. In this paper, five standards are compared and considered as a basis for testing air-to-air heat exchangers and, in particular, rotary energy exchangers. It is recommended that uncertainty analysis should be the prime criteria for accurately testing air-to-air energy recovery devices. Pre-test selection procedures are outlined that will minimize the uncertainty associated with operating conditions. Recommendations are presented for changes to ASHRAE Standard 84-1991 that will meet the needs for testing rotary energy wheels and other air-to-air heat recovery devices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rising energy costs and environmental concerns have raised interest in energy conservation, particularly energy recovery from ventilation exhaust air from buildings. Heating and cooling ventilation air often account for 20% to 40% of the total heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) energy used in commercial buildings. In this paper, five standards are compared and considered as a basis for testing air-to-air heat exchangers and, in particular, rotary energy exchangers. It is recommended that uncertainty analysis should be the prime criteria for accurately testing air-to-air energy recovery devices. Pre-test selection procedures are outlined that will minimize the uncertainty associated with operating conditions. Recommendations are presented for changes to ASHRAE Standard 84-1991 that will meet the needs for testing rotary energy wheels and other air-to-air heat recovery devices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rising energy costs and environmental concerns have raised interest in energy conservation, particularly energy recovery from ventilation exhaust air from buildings. Heating and cooling ventilation air often account for 20% to 40% of the total heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) energy used in commercial buildings. In this paper, five standards are compared and considered as a basis for testing air-to-air heat exchangers and, in particular, rotary energy exchangers. It is recommended that uncertainty analysis should be the prime criteria for accurately testing air-to-air energy recovery devices. Pre-test selection procedures are outlined that will minimize the uncertainty associated with operating conditions. Recommendations are presented for changes to ASHRAE Standard 84-1991 that will meet the needs for testing rotary energy wheels and other air-to-air heat recovery devices.

Key concepts: ASHRAE 90.1, Energy recovery ventilation, HVAC, Heat exchanger, Heat recovery ventilation, Air conditioning, Ventilation (architecture), Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some recommendations for improvements to ASHRAE Standard 84-1991 — Research Paper | ScholarLens