2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Procurement, Bidding, and Evaluation

Tony Read

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Reports that in recent years the switch from monopolistic sole sourcing from the private sector to approved book lists and decentralized financing, selection, and ordering by schools has removed the need for competitive bulk procurements of teaching and learning materials (TLM) organized by Ministries of Education (MOE), which often proved problematic in the past. Anglophone Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has seen a shift towards decentralized textbook supply systems based on MOE-approved lists and school-based choice from school per capita purchasing budgets, though the shift has proved less pronounced in Francophone Africa. All procurement bids should include minimum physical production specifications and price as part of the evaluation criteria, because failure to do this leads to shorter book life and higher costs. Good examples of bid documentation and evaluation methodologies, instruments and criteria—compulsory, qualitative, and price—for different types of procurement remain readily available, but good procurement requires good, professional supervision.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Reports that in recent years the switch from monopolistic sole sourcing from the private sector to approved book lists and decentralized financing, selection, and ordering by schools has removed the need for competitive bulk procurements of teaching and learning materials (TLM) organized by Ministries of Education (MOE), which often proved problematic in the past. Anglophone Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has seen a shift towards decentralized textbook supply systems based on MOE-approved lists and school-based choice from school per capita purchasing budgets, though the shift has proved less pronounced in Francophone Africa. All procurement bids should include minimum physical production specifications and price as part of the evaluation criteria, because failure to do this leads to shorter book life and higher costs. Good examples of bid documentation and evaluation methodologies, instruments and criteria—compulsory, qualitative, and price—for different types of procurement remain readily available, but good procurement requires good, professional supervision.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Reports that in recent years the switch from monopolistic sole sourcing from the private sector to approved book lists and decentralized financing, selection, and ordering by schools has removed the need for competitive bulk procurements of teaching and learning materials (TLM) organized by Ministries of Education (MOE), which often proved problematic in the past. Anglophone Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has seen a shift towards decentralized textbook supply systems based on MOE-approved lists and school-based choice from school per capita purchasing budgets, though the shift has proved less pronounced in Francophone Africa. All procurement bids should include minimum physical production specifications and price as part of the evaluation criteria, because failure to do this leads to shorter book life and higher costs. Good examples of bid documentation and evaluation methodologies, instruments and criteria—compulsory, qualitative, and price—for different types of procurement remain readily available, but good procurement requires good, professional supervision.

Key concepts: Procurement, Bidding, Documentation, Purchasing, Business, Accounting, Finance, Marketing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Procurement, Bidding, and Evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens