Paradoxes of Transcendence
Thomas G McFarland
Abstract
Thomas G McFarland
Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines the literature concerning freedom and necessity. It argues that the line of thought that connects freedom and necessity forced the latter into pure transcendence. It suggests that the defining location of transcendence means that freedom does not exist in actuality and that humans find that what they call freedom is always hypothecated to the claims of the actual. This chapter analyses relevant passages from the works of several writers, including John Milton and Jean-Paul Sartre.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract This chapter examines the literature concerning freedom and necessity. It argues that the line of thought that connects freedom and necessity forced the latter into pure transcendence. It suggests that the defining location of transcendence means that freedom does not exist in actuality and that humans find that what they call freedom is always hypothecated to the claims of the actual. This chapter analyses relevant passages from the works of several writers, including John Milton and Jean-Paul Sartre.
Key concepts: Transcendence (philosophy), Philosophy, Epistemology, Aesthetics, Psychoanalysis, Psychology