2018•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Hiddenness and Transcendence

Michael C. Rea

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Following on from Chapter 3, which described a continuum on which characterizations of divine transcendence generally fall, this chapter makes a case for avoiding both poles, thus locating the correct understanding of transcendence somewhere in between. Rather than advocating for a specific analysis of transcendence, however, the chapter aims to identify several consequences of a theologically adequate understanding of divine transcendence, followed by an explanation of how these consequences undercut the argument from divine hiddenness against the existence of God.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Following on from Chapter 3, which described a continuum on which characterizations of divine transcendence generally fall, this chapter makes a case for avoiding both poles, thus locating the correct understanding of transcendence somewhere in between. Rather than advocating for a specific analysis of transcendence, however, the chapter aims to identify several consequences of a theologically adequate understanding of divine transcendence, followed by an explanation of how these consequences undercut the argument from divine hiddenness against the existence of God.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Following on from Chapter 3, which described a continuum on which characterizations of divine transcendence generally fall, this chapter makes a case for avoiding both poles, thus locating the correct understanding of transcendence somewhere in between. Rather than advocating for a specific analysis of transcendence, however, the chapter aims to identify several consequences of a theologically adequate understanding of divine transcendence, followed by an explanation of how these consequences undercut the argument from divine hiddenness against the existence of God.

Key concepts: Transcendence (philosophy), Philosophy, Argument (complex analysis), Epistemology, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hiddenness and Transcendence — Research Paper | ScholarLens