2015Fordham University Press eBooksRequires access

Metonymy, Metaphor, and Perception

Harry Berger

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In his book Allegories of Reading, Paul de Man reviews Friedrich Nietzsche's notion that the paradigmatic structure of language is rhetorical instead of representational. This chapter presents discussions in which de Man differentiates between metaphor and metonymy after Jakobson's approach: paradigmatic versus syntagmatic, analogy versus contiguity, and poetic versus prosaic. In addition, de Man analyzes Marcel Proust's transgressive play with the two figures, underlining the divided practice of a text in which the direct preference for metaphor cannot seem to prevent its poetry from dissolving into the prose of metonymy. The purpose of de Man's reading of The Birth of Tragedy by Nietzsche is to demonstrate the undecidability of the text, arguing that any attempt to associate Nietzsche with a theory about metaphor and metonymy would be unreasonable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In his book Allegories of Reading, Paul de Man reviews Friedrich Nietzsche's notion that the paradigmatic structure of language is rhetorical instead of representational. This chapter presents discussions in which de Man differentiates between metaphor and metonymy after Jakobson's approach: paradigmatic versus syntagmatic, analogy versus contiguity, and poetic versus prosaic. In addition, de Man analyzes Marcel Proust's transgressive play with the two figures, underlining the divided practice of a text in which the direct preference for metaphor cannot seem to prevent its poetry from dissolving into the prose of metonymy. The purpose of de Man's reading of The Birth of Tragedy by Nietzsche is to demonstrate the undecidability of the text, arguing that any attempt to associate Nietzsche with a theory about metaphor and metonymy would be unreasonable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In his book Allegories of Reading, Paul de Man reviews Friedrich Nietzsche's notion that the paradigmatic structure of language is rhetorical instead of representational. This chapter presents discussions in which de Man differentiates between metaphor and metonymy after Jakobson's approach: paradigmatic versus syntagmatic, analogy versus contiguity, and poetic versus prosaic. In addition, de Man analyzes Marcel Proust's transgressive play with the two figures, underlining the divided practice of a text in which the direct preference for metaphor cannot seem to prevent its poetry from dissolving into the prose of metonymy. The purpose of de Man's reading of The Birth of Tragedy by Nietzsche is to demonstrate the undecidability of the text, arguing that any attempt to associate Nietzsche with a theory about metaphor and metonymy would be unreasonable.

Key concepts: Metonymy, Metaphor, Metaphor and metonymy, Perception, Linguistics, Psychology, Communication, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Metonymy, Metaphor, and Perception — Research Paper | ScholarLens