Metonymy, Metaphor, and Perception
Harry Berger
Abstract
Harry Berger
Abstract
In his book Allegories of Reading, Paul de Man reviews Friedrich Nietzsche's notion that the paradigmatic structure of language is rhetorical instead of representational. This chapter presents discussions in which de Man differentiates between metaphor and metonymy after Jakobson's approach: paradigmatic versus syntagmatic, analogy versus contiguity, and poetic versus prosaic. In addition, de Man analyzes Marcel Proust's transgressive play with the two figures, underlining the divided practice of a text in which the direct preference for metaphor cannot seem to prevent its poetry from dissolving into the prose of metonymy. The purpose of de Man's reading of The Birth of Tragedy by Nietzsche is to demonstrate the undecidability of the text, arguing that any attempt to associate Nietzsche with a theory about metaphor and metonymy would be unreasonable.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In his book Allegories of Reading, Paul de Man reviews Friedrich Nietzsche's notion that the paradigmatic structure of language is rhetorical instead of representational. This chapter presents discussions in which de Man differentiates between metaphor and metonymy after Jakobson's approach: paradigmatic versus syntagmatic, analogy versus contiguity, and poetic versus prosaic. In addition, de Man analyzes Marcel Proust's transgressive play with the two figures, underlining the divided practice of a text in which the direct preference for metaphor cannot seem to prevent its poetry from dissolving into the prose of metonymy. The purpose of de Man's reading of The Birth of Tragedy by Nietzsche is to demonstrate the undecidability of the text, arguing that any attempt to associate Nietzsche with a theory about metaphor and metonymy would be unreasonable.
Key concepts: Metonymy, Metaphor, Metaphor and metonymy, Perception, Linguistics, Psychology, Communication, Philosophy