Mismatch Between Asthma Symptoms and Spirometry: Implications for Managing Asthma in Children
John M. James
Abstract
John M. James
Abstract
To examine the concordance between spirometry and asthma symptoms in assessing asthma severity and beginning therapy by the general pediatrician.All children with asthma who were 5 to 19 years of age and were referred to the Spirometry and Aeroinhalant Allergy Testing Clinic at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center between 2008 and 2012 by a clinician participating in a study were eligible for inclusion.Spirometry testing was satisfactorily performed in 894 children whose asthma severity had been determined by their pediatrician using asthma guideline–based clinical criteria. Spirometry-determined asthma severity using national asthma guidelines and clinician-determined asthma severity were compared for concordance using weighted κ coefficients.Thirty percent of participants had clinically determined intermittent asthma; 32%, 33%, and 5% had mild, moderate, and severe, persistent asthma, respectively. Increasing disease severity was associated with decreases in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio (P < .001), the forced expiratory volume in 1 second/FVC% predicted (P < .0001), and the FVC% predicted (P < .01). In 319 children (36%), clinically determined asthma severity was lower than spirometry-determined severity. Concordance was 0.16 (95% confidence interval 0.10, 0.23) and, when adjusted for bias and prevalence, was 0.20 (95% confidence interval 0.17, 0.23). When accounting for age, sex, exposure to smoke, and insurance type, only spirometry-determined asthma severity was a significant predictor of agreement (P < .0001), with worse agreement as spirometry-determined severity increased.Concordance between spirometry and asthma symptoms in determining asthma severity is low even when guideline-based clinical assessment tools are used. Because appropriate therapy reduces asthma morbidity and is guided by disease severity, results from spirometry testing could better guide pediatricians in determining appropriate therapy for their patients with asthma.Yogi Berra once said, “It’s like déjà vu all over again.” I really think that this quote is pertinent here. For years, national asthma guidelines have recommended the use of spirometry in pediatric patients with asthma who can perform this maneuver. This recommendation is not always followed appropriately. In this current investigation, the authors report that even when clinical criteria for the determination of asthma are used correctly, spirometry testing has added value in management. Specifically, they demonstrated that the use of spirometry testing would have resulted in an assignment of a higher asthma severity category in 36% of the children in their study. This information can certainly affect the overall management of asthma in the pediatric population. So I hope I am preaching to the choir here in emphasizing that increasing access to spirometry testing, whether in the pediatrician’s office or through a consultant to a specialist, should continue to be a realistic goal to improve the overall asthma care for children.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To examine the concordance between spirometry and asthma symptoms in assessing asthma severity and beginning therapy by the general pediatrician.All children with asthma who were 5 to 19 years of age and were referred to the Spirometry and Aeroinhalant Allergy Testing Clinic at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center between 2008 and 2012 by a clinician participating in a study were eligible for inclusion.Spirometry testing was satisfactorily performed in 894 children whose asthma severity had been determined by their pediatrician using asthma guideline–based clinical criteria. Spirometry-determined asthma severity using national asthma guidelines and clinician-determined asthma severity were compared for concordance using weighted κ coefficients.Thirty percent of participants had clinically determined intermittent asthma; 32%, 33%, and 5% had mild, moderate, and severe, persistent asthma, respectively. Increasing disease severity was associated with decreases in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio (P < .001), the forced expiratory volume in 1 second/FVC% predicted (P < .0001), and the FVC% predicted (P < .01). In 319 children (36%), clinically determined asthma severity was lower than spirometry-determined severity. Concordance was 0.16 (95% confidence interval 0.10, 0.23) and, when adjusted for bias and prevalence, was 0.20 (95% confidence interval 0.17, 0.23). When accounting for age, sex, exposure to smoke, and insurance type, only spirometry-determined asthma severity was a significant predictor of agreement (P < .0001), with worse agreement as spirometry-determined severity increased.Concordance between spirometry and asthma symptoms in determining asthma severity is low even when guideline-based clinical assessment tools are used. Because appropriate therapy reduces asthma morbidity and is guided by disease severity, results from spirometry testing could better guide pediatricians in determining appropriate therapy for their patients with asthma.Yogi Berra once said, “It’s like déjà vu all over again.” I really think that this quote is pertinent here. For years, national asthma guidelines have recommended the use of spirometry in pediatric patients with asthma who can perform this maneuver. This recommendation is not always followed appropriately. In this current investigation, the authors report that even when clinical criteria for the determination of asthma are used correctly, spirometry testing has added value in management. Specifically, they demonstrated that the use of spirometry testing would have resulted in an assignment of a higher asthma severity category in 36% of the children in their study. This information can certainly affect the overall management of asthma in the pediatric population. So I hope I am preaching to the choir here in emphasizing that increasing access to spirometry testing, whether in the pediatrician’s office or through a consultant to a specialist, should continue to be a realistic goal to improve the overall asthma care for children.
Key concepts: Spirometry, Medicine, Asthma, Concordance, Confidence interval, Vital capacity, Guideline, Physical therapy