2010Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Thinking Intersectionality: Sexualities and the Politics of Multiple Identities

James Joseph Dean

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Sexuality studies have been moving toward a research program that emphasizes sexualities as part of the intersectional study of identity categories, such as race, class, and gender for over two decades now (Gamson and Moon, 2004; Taylor, 2007). On one hand, intersectional understandings of sexualities complicate and better capture individuals’ lived experiences. Yet, on the other hand, intersectionality points to a potentially endless process of multiplying identity categories indefinitely. Consequentially, intersectionality can end up recapitulating the same essentialist epistemology of experience framework that constitutes focusing on a single identity category (Clough, 1994; Seidman, 2007). To this end, I explore the benefits and limits of intersectionality for sexuality studies, highlighting my theoretical points with a US-based case study of racial heterosexual masculinities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sexuality studies have been moving toward a research program that emphasizes sexualities as part of the intersectional study of identity categories, such as race, class, and gender for over two decades now (Gamson and Moon, 2004; Taylor, 2007). On one hand, intersectional understandings of sexualities complicate and better capture individuals’ lived experiences. Yet, on the other hand, intersectionality points to a potentially endless process of multiplying identity categories indefinitely. Consequentially, intersectionality can end up recapitulating the same essentialist epistemology of experience framework that constitutes focusing on a single identity category (Clough, 1994; Seidman, 2007). To this end, I explore the benefits and limits of intersectionality for sexuality studies, highlighting my theoretical points with a US-based case study of racial heterosexual masculinities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sexuality studies have been moving toward a research program that emphasizes sexualities as part of the intersectional study of identity categories, such as race, class, and gender for over two decades now (Gamson and Moon, 2004; Taylor, 2007). On one hand, intersectional understandings of sexualities complicate and better capture individuals’ lived experiences. Yet, on the other hand, intersectionality points to a potentially endless process of multiplying identity categories indefinitely. Consequentially, intersectionality can end up recapitulating the same essentialist epistemology of experience framework that constitutes focusing on a single identity category (Clough, 1994; Seidman, 2007). To this end, I explore the benefits and limits of intersectionality for sexuality studies, highlighting my theoretical points with a US-based case study of racial heterosexual masculinities.

Key concepts: Intersectionality, Human sexuality, Gender studies, Essentialism, Race (biology), Identity (music), Sociology, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Thinking Intersectionality: Sexualities and the Politics of Multiple Identities — Research Paper | ScholarLens