2014•Unpublished venueRequires access

Policing Social Cohesion: Community Policing for Counter-Terrorism

Victoria Sentas

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter begins with the alignment of counter-terrorism policing with multicultural social policy through the concept of social cohesion. The official discourse of Australian governments in relation to terrorism exhibit two simultaneous tendencies: it serves to valorise multiculturalism as a policy of social integration, and it expresses the limits of multiculturalism for creating social harmony. Participation in dialogue between police and community mediates a symbolic exchange of recognition in return for national belonging. Muslim isolation, segregation, and mistrust of the police acquire significance as social conflict likely to radicalise and therefore result in violence. The promise of social cohesion carries with it an obligation for Muslims to participate in the organisation of the state, by consenting to being policed. While this process of participation is promoted as an inclusive one, it relies on particular characterisations of difference that facilitate assimilatory forms of containment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter begins with the alignment of counter-terrorism policing with multicultural social policy through the concept of social cohesion. The official discourse of Australian governments in relation to terrorism exhibit two simultaneous tendencies: it serves to valorise multiculturalism as a policy of social integration, and it expresses the limits of multiculturalism for creating social harmony. Participation in dialogue between police and community mediates a symbolic exchange of recognition in return for national belonging. Muslim isolation, segregation, and mistrust of the police acquire significance as social conflict likely to radicalise and therefore result in violence. The promise of social cohesion carries with it an obligation for Muslims to participate in the organisation of the state, by consenting to being policed. While this process of participation is promoted as an inclusive one, it relies on particular characterisations of difference that facilitate assimilatory forms of containment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter begins with the alignment of counter-terrorism policing with multicultural social policy through the concept of social cohesion. The official discourse of Australian governments in relation to terrorism exhibit two simultaneous tendencies: it serves to valorise multiculturalism as a policy of social integration, and it expresses the limits of multiculturalism for creating social harmony. Participation in dialogue between police and community mediates a symbolic exchange of recognition in return for national belonging. Muslim isolation, segregation, and mistrust of the police acquire significance as social conflict likely to radicalise and therefore result in violence. The promise of social cohesion carries with it an obligation for Muslims to participate in the organisation of the state, by consenting to being policed. While this process of participation is promoted as an inclusive one, it relies on particular characterisations of difference that facilitate assimilatory forms of containment.

Key concepts: Multiculturalism, Cohesion (chemistry), Terrorism, Obligation, Political science, Harmony (color), Community cohesion, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Policing Social Cohesion: Community Policing for Counter-Terrorism — Research Paper | ScholarLens