2007•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Trade and Environment in Asia: Snipping the WTO’s Gordian Knot

Simon S. C. Tay

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter argues that developing countries should respond to trade and environment issues and seek to develop a realistic, proactive, and positive agenda of trade liberalization. Rubens Ricupero, then Secretary General of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), was amongst the first to propose the need for such an agenda, which he did during the 1996 Ministerial meeting of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and later elaborated in an UNCTAD (2000) paper. A positive agenda might minimize the possibilities of developing countries being made victims of trade protectionism and increase the prospects of their benefiting from giving due and appropriate attention to environmental issues in the trade context in a concessionary manner. Conversely, a negative agenda—one that lists only wants, without addressing the non-trade concerns of the developed countries—would only perpetuate the impasse in negotiations with the North.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter argues that developing countries should respond to trade and environment issues and seek to develop a realistic, proactive, and positive agenda of trade liberalization. Rubens Ricupero, then Secretary General of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), was amongst the first to propose the need for such an agenda, which he did during the 1996 Ministerial meeting of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and later elaborated in an UNCTAD (2000) paper. A positive agenda might minimize the possibilities of developing countries being made victims of trade protectionism and increase the prospects of their benefiting from giving due and appropriate attention to environmental issues in the trade context in a concessionary manner. Conversely, a negative agenda—one that lists only wants, without addressing the non-trade concerns of the developed countries—would only perpetuate the impasse in negotiations with the North.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter argues that developing countries should respond to trade and environment issues and seek to develop a realistic, proactive, and positive agenda of trade liberalization. Rubens Ricupero, then Secretary General of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), was amongst the first to propose the need for such an agenda, which he did during the 1996 Ministerial meeting of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and later elaborated in an UNCTAD (2000) paper. A positive agenda might minimize the possibilities of developing countries being made victims of trade protectionism and increase the prospects of their benefiting from giving due and appropriate attention to environmental issues in the trade context in a concessionary manner. Conversely, a negative agenda—one that lists only wants, without addressing the non-trade concerns of the developed countries—would only perpetuate the impasse in negotiations with the North.

Key concepts: Protectionism, International trade, Negotiation, Free trade, Developing country, Context (archaeology), Political science, Multilateral trade negotiations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Trade and Environment in Asia: Snipping the WTO’s Gordian Knot — Research Paper | ScholarLens