PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY, PROTECTIONISM AND THE CASE OF NAFTA
David Quartner
Abstract
David Quartner
Abstract
Public choice theory suggests that the political process has an in‐built tendency to promote protectionist measures favoured by organised interest groups rather than trade liberalisation that would benefit society as a whole. But the example of the North American Free Trade Agreement shows that political campaigns in support of free trade can successfully mobilise public opinion to neutralise the power of special‐interest groups. Therefore, it is imperative that politicians and others who believe in free trade remind the public of its benefits.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Public choice theory suggests that the political process has an in‐built tendency to promote protectionist measures favoured by organised interest groups rather than trade liberalisation that would benefit society as a whole. But the example of the North American Free Trade Agreement shows that political campaigns in support of free trade can successfully mobilise public opinion to neutralise the power of special‐interest groups. Therefore, it is imperative that politicians and others who believe in free trade remind the public of its benefits.
Key concepts: Protectionism, Free trade, Liberalization, Politics, Free trade agreement, Public interest, International trade, Public choice