2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

Vernacularizing the Political

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

What was the relationship between sovereignty and revolutionary war among the Filipinos who overthrew Spain and later resisted the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century? To what extent was a political theology of sovereignty, inherited from the Spanish regime, transformed into a discourse of emancipation by Filipino nationalist elites? How were both notions translated in turn into populist, Christian vernacular terms that stressed generosity, compassion, and the work of pity to account for revolutionary history? These are the questions that this chapter raises against the backdrop of more recent debates on the salience of theological legal notions of sovereignty for understanding the imperial power of the West. Through a close reading of Tagalog accounts, it shows how Filipino vernacular notions of freedom understood as compassion and pity invariably exceed and elude such Western notions during a time of revolutionary war.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

What was the relationship between sovereignty and revolutionary war among the Filipinos who overthrew Spain and later resisted the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century? To what extent was a political theology of sovereignty, inherited from the Spanish regime, transformed into a discourse of emancipation by Filipino nationalist elites? How were both notions translated in turn into populist, Christian vernacular terms that stressed generosity, compassion, and the work of pity to account for revolutionary history? These are the questions that this chapter raises against the backdrop of more recent debates on the salience of theological legal notions of sovereignty for understanding the imperial power of the West. Through a close reading of Tagalog accounts, it shows how Filipino vernacular notions of freedom understood as compassion and pity invariably exceed and elude such Western notions during a time of revolutionary war.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

What was the relationship between sovereignty and revolutionary war among the Filipinos who overthrew Spain and later resisted the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century? To what extent was a political theology of sovereignty, inherited from the Spanish regime, transformed into a discourse of emancipation by Filipino nationalist elites? How were both notions translated in turn into populist, Christian vernacular terms that stressed generosity, compassion, and the work of pity to account for revolutionary history? These are the questions that this chapter raises against the backdrop of more recent debates on the salience of theological legal notions of sovereignty for understanding the imperial power of the West. Through a close reading of Tagalog accounts, it shows how Filipino vernacular notions of freedom understood as compassion and pity invariably exceed and elude such Western notions during a time of revolutionary war.

Key concepts: Sovereignty, Emancipation, Politics, Nationalism, Power (physics), Vernacular, Political science, Gender studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vernacularizing the Political — Research Paper | ScholarLens