Vernacularizing the Political
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
What was the relationship between sovereignty and revolutionary war among the Filipinos who overthrew Spain and later resisted the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century? To what extent was a political theology of sovereignty, inherited from the Spanish regime, transformed into a discourse of emancipation by Filipino nationalist elites? How were both notions translated in turn into populist, Christian vernacular terms that stressed generosity, compassion, and the work of pity to account for revolutionary history? These are the questions that this chapter raises against the backdrop of more recent debates on the salience of theological legal notions of sovereignty for understanding the imperial power of the West. Through a close reading of Tagalog accounts, it shows how Filipino vernacular notions of freedom understood as compassion and pity invariably exceed and elude such Western notions during a time of revolutionary war.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
What was the relationship between sovereignty and revolutionary war among the Filipinos who overthrew Spain and later resisted the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century? To what extent was a political theology of sovereignty, inherited from the Spanish regime, transformed into a discourse of emancipation by Filipino nationalist elites? How were both notions translated in turn into populist, Christian vernacular terms that stressed generosity, compassion, and the work of pity to account for revolutionary history? These are the questions that this chapter raises against the backdrop of more recent debates on the salience of theological legal notions of sovereignty for understanding the imperial power of the West. Through a close reading of Tagalog accounts, it shows how Filipino vernacular notions of freedom understood as compassion and pity invariably exceed and elude such Western notions during a time of revolutionary war.
Key concepts: Sovereignty, Emancipation, Politics, Nationalism, Power (physics), Vernacular, Political science, Gender studies