Who Needs Labour Law? Defining the Scope of Labour Protection
Benjamin D. Paul
Abstract
Benjamin D. Paul
Abstract
Drawing on the experience of South Africa's ambitious efforts to reform labour law so as to serve a people left impoverished and under-skilled by apartheid, this chapter explores the folly of deploying a binary and centuries-old legal distinction to sort out the gradations of dependency and subordination found in contemporary work relationships. Defining an employee raises two related but distinct issues. The first is an issue of legislative policy — what legal instruments and institutions should determine who receives the protection of labour law. The second is a question of judicial interpretation — how courts and other arbitral forums interpret legal definitions of who should be covered by labour law. This chapter seeks to address both these issues. It suggests that the legislators have retained the traditional approach of placing the responsibility for determining who should receive the protection of labour law in the hands of the courts.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Drawing on the experience of South Africa's ambitious efforts to reform labour law so as to serve a people left impoverished and under-skilled by apartheid, this chapter explores the folly of deploying a binary and centuries-old legal distinction to sort out the gradations of dependency and subordination found in contemporary work relationships. Defining an employee raises two related but distinct issues. The first is an issue of legislative policy — what legal instruments and institutions should determine who receives the protection of labour law. The second is a question of judicial interpretation — how courts and other arbitral forums interpret legal definitions of who should be covered by labour law. This chapter seeks to address both these issues. It suggests that the legislators have retained the traditional approach of placing the responsibility for determining who should receive the protection of labour law in the hands of the courts.
Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Labour law, Labour economics, Business, Law, Economics, Law and economics, Political science