2004Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Who Needs Labour Law? Defining the Scope of Labour Protection

Benjamin D. Paul

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Drawing on the experience of South Africa's ambitious efforts to reform labour law so as to serve a people left impoverished and under-skilled by apartheid, this chapter explores the folly of deploying a binary and centuries-old legal distinction to sort out the gradations of dependency and subordination found in contemporary work relationships. Defining an employee raises two related but distinct issues. The first is an issue of legislative policy — what legal instruments and institutions should determine who receives the protection of labour law. The second is a question of judicial interpretation — how courts and other arbitral forums interpret legal definitions of who should be covered by labour law. This chapter seeks to address both these issues. It suggests that the legislators have retained the traditional approach of placing the responsibility for determining who should receive the protection of labour law in the hands of the courts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Drawing on the experience of South Africa's ambitious efforts to reform labour law so as to serve a people left impoverished and under-skilled by apartheid, this chapter explores the folly of deploying a binary and centuries-old legal distinction to sort out the gradations of dependency and subordination found in contemporary work relationships. Defining an employee raises two related but distinct issues. The first is an issue of legislative policy — what legal instruments and institutions should determine who receives the protection of labour law. The second is a question of judicial interpretation — how courts and other arbitral forums interpret legal definitions of who should be covered by labour law. This chapter seeks to address both these issues. It suggests that the legislators have retained the traditional approach of placing the responsibility for determining who should receive the protection of labour law in the hands of the courts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Drawing on the experience of South Africa's ambitious efforts to reform labour law so as to serve a people left impoverished and under-skilled by apartheid, this chapter explores the folly of deploying a binary and centuries-old legal distinction to sort out the gradations of dependency and subordination found in contemporary work relationships. Defining an employee raises two related but distinct issues. The first is an issue of legislative policy — what legal instruments and institutions should determine who receives the protection of labour law. The second is a question of judicial interpretation — how courts and other arbitral forums interpret legal definitions of who should be covered by labour law. This chapter seeks to address both these issues. It suggests that the legislators have retained the traditional approach of placing the responsibility for determining who should receive the protection of labour law in the hands of the courts.

Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Labour law, Labour economics, Business, Law, Economics, Law and economics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Who Needs Labour Law? Defining the Scope of Labour Protection — Research Paper | ScholarLens