2013Unpublished venueRequires access

The Seeds of Dispersion

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Feynman diagrams' dispersion in pictorial form, with their attendant dispersion in calculational roles, may be derived from at least two sources. In the first place, the diagrams' original progenitors—Feynman and Dyson—disagreed about the diagrams' proper forms, uses, and meanings. The split between Feynman and Dyson provided one key ingredient for the diagrams' later scattered order. The other crucial factor came from the failure of Feynman's and Dyson's original diagrammatic techniques when physicists tried to tackle the behavior of particles beyond the familiar electron and photon. Theorists such as Paul Matthews, Jack Steinberger, and Abraham Pais tinkered with the form of their diagrams, all in an effort to craft their diagrams to better suit their new purposes. Eventually, between the Feynman–Dyson split and the failure of perturbative approaches for treating nuclear forces, Feynman diagrams' pictorial forms and calculational roles became more and more differentiated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The Feynman diagrams' dispersion in pictorial form, with their attendant dispersion in calculational roles, may be derived from at least two sources. In the first place, the diagrams' original progenitors—Feynman and Dyson—disagreed about the diagrams' proper forms, uses, and meanings. The split between Feynman and Dyson provided one key ingredient for the diagrams' later scattered order. The other crucial factor came from the failure of Feynman's and Dyson's original diagrammatic techniques when physicists tried to tackle the behavior of particles beyond the familiar electron and photon. Theorists such as Paul Matthews, Jack Steinberger, and Abraham Pais tinkered with the form of their diagrams, all in an effort to craft their diagrams to better suit their new purposes. Eventually, between the Feynman–Dyson split and the failure of perturbative approaches for treating nuclear forces, Feynman diagrams' pictorial forms and calculational roles became more and more differentiated.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The Feynman diagrams' dispersion in pictorial form, with their attendant dispersion in calculational roles, may be derived from at least two sources. In the first place, the diagrams' original progenitors—Feynman and Dyson—disagreed about the diagrams' proper forms, uses, and meanings. The split between Feynman and Dyson provided one key ingredient for the diagrams' later scattered order. The other crucial factor came from the failure of Feynman's and Dyson's original diagrammatic techniques when physicists tried to tackle the behavior of particles beyond the familiar electron and photon. Theorists such as Paul Matthews, Jack Steinberger, and Abraham Pais tinkered with the form of their diagrams, all in an effort to craft their diagrams to better suit their new purposes. Eventually, between the Feynman–Dyson split and the failure of perturbative approaches for treating nuclear forces, Feynman diagrams' pictorial forms and calculational roles became more and more differentiated.

Key concepts: Feynman diagram, Diagrammatic reasoning, Diagram, Feynman graph, Theoretical physics, Physics, Dispersion (optics), Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Seeds of Dispersion — Research Paper | ScholarLens