Teaching the Diagrams in an Age of Textbooks
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Many of the diagrammatic maneuvers regarding the Feynman diagrams have provided the scaffolding for what coalesced as the S-matrix program. Several theorists hoped that this diagram-derived program would provide a new theory of nuclear particles' interactions that could replace the rival quantum-field-theoretic framework. This chapter discusses the paper tools that have become essential to the S-matrix program and describes how physicists chose to write about and teach Feynman's diagrams during the new age of textbooks. Despite the postwar publishing boom in the United States, textbooks on the new diagrammatic techniques did not enter publishing immediately. There were two main reasons the publication of textbooks did not halt the diagrammatic diversity. First, the textbook authors focused on teaching useful piecemeal tools and techniques rather than overarching theories. Second, the textbook authors reinscribed the original Feynman–Dyson split, thereby continuing a tension over the place Feynman diagrams should assume.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Many of the diagrammatic maneuvers regarding the Feynman diagrams have provided the scaffolding for what coalesced as the S-matrix program. Several theorists hoped that this diagram-derived program would provide a new theory of nuclear particles' interactions that could replace the rival quantum-field-theoretic framework. This chapter discusses the paper tools that have become essential to the S-matrix program and describes how physicists chose to write about and teach Feynman's diagrams during the new age of textbooks. Despite the postwar publishing boom in the United States, textbooks on the new diagrammatic techniques did not enter publishing immediately. There were two main reasons the publication of textbooks did not halt the diagrammatic diversity. First, the textbook authors focused on teaching useful piecemeal tools and techniques rather than overarching theories. Second, the textbook authors reinscribed the original Feynman–Dyson split, thereby continuing a tension over the place Feynman diagrams should assume.
Key concepts: Diagrammatic reasoning, Feynman diagram, Publishing, Quantum field theory, Computer science, Matrix (chemical analysis), Field (mathematics), Diagram