2010Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Humanitarian Intervention and International Law

James Pattison

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

It is often claimed that humanitarian intervention should be undertaken only by those interveners whose action would be legal according to current international law. This chapter considers this assertion by assessing the moral importance of an intervener's legal status. It begins by suggesting that, according to the current international law on humanitarian intervention, UN Security Council authorization is required for an intervener's action to be legal. It then critically examines—and largely rejects—a number of possible arguments for the importance of an intervener's legal status. In particular, it considers the arguments that (a) legal interveners derive their authority from morally valuable procedures; (b) illegal humanitarian intervention is itself abusive; (c) illegal humanitarian intervention leads to abusive intervention; and (d) illegal humanitarian intervention undermines international order.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is often claimed that humanitarian intervention should be undertaken only by those interveners whose action would be legal according to current international law. This chapter considers this assertion by assessing the moral importance of an intervener's legal status. It begins by suggesting that, according to the current international law on humanitarian intervention, UN Security Council authorization is required for an intervener's action to be legal. It then critically examines—and largely rejects—a number of possible arguments for the importance of an intervener's legal status. In particular, it considers the arguments that (a) legal interveners derive their authority from morally valuable procedures; (b) illegal humanitarian intervention is itself abusive; (c) illegal humanitarian intervention leads to abusive intervention; and (d) illegal humanitarian intervention undermines international order.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is often claimed that humanitarian intervention should be undertaken only by those interveners whose action would be legal according to current international law. This chapter considers this assertion by assessing the moral importance of an intervener's legal status. It begins by suggesting that, according to the current international law on humanitarian intervention, UN Security Council authorization is required for an intervener's action to be legal. It then critically examines—and largely rejects—a number of possible arguments for the importance of an intervener's legal status. In particular, it considers the arguments that (a) legal interveners derive their authority from morally valuable procedures; (b) illegal humanitarian intervention is itself abusive; (c) illegal humanitarian intervention leads to abusive intervention; and (d) illegal humanitarian intervention undermines international order.

Key concepts: Humanitarian intervention, Law, Political science, Intervention (counseling), International humanitarian law, International law, Medicine, Psychiatry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Humanitarian Intervention and International Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens