2010•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Quine and Tarski on Nominalism

Pietro Mancosu

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

This chapter contains a detailed study of the nominalistic engagement of Quine and Tarski up to 1953 (the date of an important conference on “Nominalism and Platonism in Contemporary Logic” organized by Beth in Amersfoort). Through the use of the Quine archive and some other important sources it reconstructs the dialectic of caution and engagement that characterized the approach to nominalism of these two giants of analytic philosophy. In the process it also sheds light on Beth’s contribution to the discussion on nominalism vs. Platonism in logic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter contains a detailed study of the nominalistic engagement of Quine and Tarski up to 1953 (the date of an important conference on “Nominalism and Platonism in Contemporary Logic” organized by Beth in Amersfoort). Through the use of the Quine archive and some other important sources it reconstructs the dialectic of caution and engagement that characterized the approach to nominalism of these two giants of analytic philosophy. In the process it also sheds light on Beth’s contribution to the discussion on nominalism vs. Platonism in logic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter contains a detailed study of the nominalistic engagement of Quine and Tarski up to 1953 (the date of an important conference on “Nominalism and Platonism in Contemporary Logic” organized by Beth in Amersfoort). Through the use of the Quine archive and some other important sources it reconstructs the dialectic of caution and engagement that characterized the approach to nominalism of these two giants of analytic philosophy. In the process it also sheds light on Beth’s contribution to the discussion on nominalism vs. Platonism in logic.

Key concepts: Nominalism, Quine, Platonism, Dialectic, Epistemology, Philosophy, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quine and Tarski on Nominalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens