1987•PubMedRequires access

Pharmacokinetic comparison of intranasal, oral, and intramuscular metoclopramide in healthy volunteers.

Citron Ml, J R Reynolds, J. Kalra, Kay Bg, Nathan Ka, N D Jaffe, F R Miller

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

This was a randomized, crossover study of the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of metoclopramide given by intranasal (IN), oral (PO), and intramuscular (IM) routes. The formulations tested were 5 and 10 mg of IN gel, 10 mg PO, and 5 mg IM. The findings showed that metoclopramide follows similar absorption and elimination characteristics when given via these three extravascular routes. There were no statistically significant differences in the area under the drug concentration versus time curve (AUC) or peak metoclopramide plasma concentration (Cmax) data following PO, IM, or 10-mg IN administration. However, the 5-mg IN doses achieved an AUC that was 39.5% the AUC of the 10-mg IN dose. These data show consistent and relatively predictable metoclopramide plasma concentrations following IN administration. Further, 10-mg doses of IN and PO metoclopramide appear to be bioequivalent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This was a randomized, crossover study of the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of metoclopramide given by intranasal (IN), oral (PO), and intramuscular (IM) routes. The formulations tested were 5 and 10 mg of IN gel, 10 mg PO, and 5 mg IM. The findings showed that metoclopramide follows similar absorption and elimination characteristics when given via these three extravascular routes. There were no statistically significant differences in the area under the drug concentration versus time curve (AUC) or peak metoclopramide plasma concentration (Cmax) data following PO, IM, or 10-mg IN administration. However, the 5-mg IN doses achieved an AUC that was 39.5% the AUC of the 10-mg IN dose. These data show consistent and relatively predictable metoclopramide plasma concentrations following IN administration. Further, 10-mg doses of IN and PO metoclopramide appear to be bioequivalent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This was a randomized, crossover study of the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of metoclopramide given by intranasal (IN), oral (PO), and intramuscular (IM) routes. The formulations tested were 5 and 10 mg of IN gel, 10 mg PO, and 5 mg IM. The findings showed that metoclopramide follows similar absorption and elimination characteristics when given via these three extravascular routes. There were no statistically significant differences in the area under the drug concentration versus time curve (AUC) or peak metoclopramide plasma concentration (Cmax) data following PO, IM, or 10-mg IN administration. However, the 5-mg IN doses achieved an AUC that was 39.5% the AUC of the 10-mg IN dose. These data show consistent and relatively predictable metoclopramide plasma concentrations following IN administration. Further, 10-mg doses of IN and PO metoclopramide appear to be bioequivalent.

Key concepts: Metoclopramide, Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, Medicine, Cmax, Bioavailability, Crossover study, Nasal administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pharmacokinetic comparison of intranasal, oral, and intramuscular metoclopramide in healthy volunteers. — Research Paper | ScholarLens