2002PubMedRequires access

[Retirement plan for a 70-year-old. Intravenous urography disembarks from uroradiology].

Henrik S. Thomsen, S Lindequist, E Brems-Dalgaard

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Over the last 70 years, intravenous urography (IVU) has played a major role in the work-up of diseases in the kidneys and the upper urinary tract. However, modern cross-sectional modalities have shown that IVU does not fulfill current requirements. Patients with renal colic are better examined by non-enhanced CT scanning, as it finds more stones (60 versus 100%). Furthermore, a disease outside the upper urinary tract is found in about 15% of patients with renal colic, and in 3% another kidney or upper urinary tract disease is found. For patients with haematuria, CT urography is a better alternative, as it combines the advantages of CT with those of IVU. IVU misses about 15% of renal tumours above 3 cm in diameter and almost all below 3 cm. MR urography is the newest way of imaging the upper urinary tract; its exact role is still undetermined, but it is recommended for children, young persons, and pregnant women. After 70 years of good performance, it is time for IVU to retire.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the last 70 years, intravenous urography (IVU) has played a major role in the work-up of diseases in the kidneys and the upper urinary tract. However, modern cross-sectional modalities have shown that IVU does not fulfill current requirements. Patients with renal colic are better examined by non-enhanced CT scanning, as it finds more stones (60 versus 100%). Furthermore, a disease outside the upper urinary tract is found in about 15% of patients with renal colic, and in 3% another kidney or upper urinary tract disease is found. For patients with haematuria, CT urography is a better alternative, as it combines the advantages of CT with those of IVU. IVU misses about 15% of renal tumours above 3 cm in diameter and almost all below 3 cm. MR urography is the newest way of imaging the upper urinary tract; its exact role is still undetermined, but it is recommended for children, young persons, and pregnant women. After 70 years of good performance, it is time for IVU to retire.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the last 70 years, intravenous urography (IVU) has played a major role in the work-up of diseases in the kidneys and the upper urinary tract. However, modern cross-sectional modalities have shown that IVU does not fulfill current requirements. Patients with renal colic are better examined by non-enhanced CT scanning, as it finds more stones (60 versus 100%). Furthermore, a disease outside the upper urinary tract is found in about 15% of patients with renal colic, and in 3% another kidney or upper urinary tract disease is found. For patients with haematuria, CT urography is a better alternative, as it combines the advantages of CT with those of IVU. IVU misses about 15% of renal tumours above 3 cm in diameter and almost all below 3 cm. MR urography is the newest way of imaging the upper urinary tract; its exact role is still undetermined, but it is recommended for children, young persons, and pregnant women. After 70 years of good performance, it is time for IVU to retire.

Key concepts: Intravenous urography, Medicine, Pyelogram, Renal colic, Upper urinary tract, Urinary system, Radiology, Urology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Retirement plan for a 70-year-old. Intravenous urography disembarks from uroradiology]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens