2008•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Provincial Autonomy and Frontier Defense in Late Tang: The Case of the Lulong Army

David Andrew Graff

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

We can group the forty or so military provinces into which Tang China was divided in the aftermath of the An Lushan Rebellion (755–63) in several broad categories on the basis of their region, function, and attitude toward the Tang court in Chang’an. Representing one extreme were several highly militarized provinces that enjoyed a very high degree of autonomy, paid no taxes to the center, and insisted on the right of hereditary succession to the office of military governor (jiedushi). The longest lasting of these autonomous provinces were the so-called “three garrisons of Hebei” (Hebei san zhen: Youzhou, Chengde, and Wei-Bo), whose military leaders traced their origins to the rebel armies of An Lushan (d. 757). Facing these recalcitrant provinces across a confrontation line that ran along the Taihang Mountains (Taihang shan) and over the Henan Plain was a string of loyalist provinces that also maintained powerful military forces. Those in Henan were especially sensitive because they guarded the Bian Canal (Bian he), the principal route for tax and tribute revenues from the rich Lower Yangzi region and therefore the logistical lifeline of the Tang court. The southern provinces that provided the economic underpinning for imperial power were only lightly garrisoned, and their governors tended to be civil officials rather than military men. Revenues from the south made it possible to sustain another group of heavily armed loyalist provinces, located in relatively poor areas north and west of Chang’an, whose primary responsibility was to protect the capital from the Tibetans.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We can group the forty or so military provinces into which Tang China was divided in the aftermath of the An Lushan Rebellion (755–63) in several broad categories on the basis of their region, function, and attitude toward the Tang court in Chang’an. Representing one extreme were several highly militarized provinces that enjoyed a very high degree of autonomy, paid no taxes to the center, and insisted on the right of hereditary succession to the office of military governor (jiedushi). The longest lasting of these autonomous provinces were the so-called “three garrisons of Hebei” (Hebei san zhen: Youzhou, Chengde, and Wei-Bo), whose military leaders traced their origins to the rebel armies of An Lushan (d. 757). Facing these recalcitrant provinces across a confrontation line that ran along the Taihang Mountains (Taihang shan) and over the Henan Plain was a string of loyalist provinces that also maintained powerful military forces. Those in Henan were especially sensitive because they guarded the Bian Canal (Bian he), the principal route for tax and tribute revenues from the rich Lower Yangzi region and therefore the logistical lifeline of the Tang court. The southern provinces that provided the economic underpinning for imperial power were only lightly garrisoned, and their governors tended to be civil officials rather than military men. Revenues from the south made it possible to sustain another group of heavily armed loyalist provinces, located in relatively poor areas north and west of Chang’an, whose primary responsibility was to protect the capital from the Tibetans.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We can group the forty or so military provinces into which Tang China was divided in the aftermath of the An Lushan Rebellion (755–63) in several broad categories on the basis of their region, function, and attitude toward the Tang court in Chang’an. Representing one extreme were several highly militarized provinces that enjoyed a very high degree of autonomy, paid no taxes to the center, and insisted on the right of hereditary succession to the office of military governor (jiedushi). The longest lasting of these autonomous provinces were the so-called “three garrisons of Hebei” (Hebei san zhen: Youzhou, Chengde, and Wei-Bo), whose military leaders traced their origins to the rebel armies of An Lushan (d. 757). Facing these recalcitrant provinces across a confrontation line that ran along the Taihang Mountains (Taihang shan) and over the Henan Plain was a string of loyalist provinces that also maintained powerful military forces. Those in Henan were especially sensitive because they guarded the Bian Canal (Bian he), the principal route for tax and tribute revenues from the rich Lower Yangzi region and therefore the logistical lifeline of the Tang court. The southern provinces that provided the economic underpinning for imperial power were only lightly garrisoned, and their governors tended to be civil officials rather than military men. Revenues from the south made it possible to sustain another group of heavily armed loyalist provinces, located in relatively poor areas north and west of Chang’an, whose primary responsibility was to protect the capital from the Tibetans.

Key concepts: Frontier, Tribute, Geography, Autonomy, China, Jurisdiction, Revenue, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Provincial Autonomy and Frontier Defense in Late Tang: The Case of the Lulong Army — Research Paper | ScholarLens