ScholarLens Back to search
2001•The University of Chicago Law ReviewRequires access

Allocating the Burden of Proof in Rule 60(b)(4) Motions to Vacate a Default Judgment for Lack of Jurisdiction

Ariel Waldman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Ariel Waldman, Allocating the Burden of Proof in Rule 60(b)(4) Motions to Vacate a Default Judgment for Lack of Jurisdiction, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 2 (Spring, 2001), pp. 521-549

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ariel Waldman, Allocating the Burden of Proof in Rule 60(b)(4) Motions to Vacate a Default Judgment for Lack of Jurisdiction, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 2 (Spring, 2001), pp. 521-549

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ariel Waldman, Allocating the Burden of Proof in Rule 60(b)(4) Motions to Vacate a Default Judgment for Lack of Jurisdiction, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 2 (Spring, 2001), pp. 521-549

Key concepts: Burden of proof, Jurisdiction, Law and economics, Proof of concept, Business, Computer science, Economics, Law

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Allocating the Burden of Proof in Rule 60(b)(4) Motions to Vacate a Default Judgment for Lack of Jurisdiction — Research Paper | ScholarLens