1995•PubMedRequires access

Making a transition from quality assurance to quality improvement.

Laura Caramanica, Cheryl Ficara, Patrick Fitzgerald Moynihan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Health care leaders now recognize the importance of adding continuous quality improvement activities and the measurement of clinical outcomes to their longstanding quality programs. From other industry leaders, they have learned that there is great promise on quality/cost returns when quality programs focus on measuring performance outcomes rather than just using the longstanding process of measuring variation in staff and system capacity processes. The purpose of this article is to describe how one urban acute care hospital is taking steps to change its quality paradigm and therefore change its quality program, which until recently consisted largely of unrelated quality assurance activities and projects. The new system will be a truly coordinated hospital wide continuous quality improvement program that will align quality activities with the mission of the organization and focus on the measurement of outcomes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Health care leaders now recognize the importance of adding continuous quality improvement activities and the measurement of clinical outcomes to their longstanding quality programs. From other industry leaders, they have learned that there is great promise on quality/cost returns when quality programs focus on measuring performance outcomes rather than just using the longstanding process of measuring variation in staff and system capacity processes. The purpose of this article is to describe how one urban acute care hospital is taking steps to change its quality paradigm and therefore change its quality program, which until recently consisted largely of unrelated quality assurance activities and projects. The new system will be a truly coordinated hospital wide continuous quality improvement program that will align quality activities with the mission of the organization and focus on the measurement of outcomes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Health care leaders now recognize the importance of adding continuous quality improvement activities and the measurement of clinical outcomes to their longstanding quality programs. From other industry leaders, they have learned that there is great promise on quality/cost returns when quality programs focus on measuring performance outcomes rather than just using the longstanding process of measuring variation in staff and system capacity processes. The purpose of this article is to describe how one urban acute care hospital is taking steps to change its quality paradigm and therefore change its quality program, which until recently consisted largely of unrelated quality assurance activities and projects. The new system will be a truly coordinated hospital wide continuous quality improvement program that will align quality activities with the mission of the organization and focus on the measurement of outcomes.

Key concepts: Quality assurance, Quality management, Quality (philosophy), Quality policy, Health care, Process management, Process (computing), Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Making a transition from quality assurance to quality improvement. — Research Paper | ScholarLens