A review on conventional psychoacoustic evaluation tools, methods and algorithms
Alexander Stojanow, Judith Liebetrau
Abstract
Alexander Stojanow, Judith Liebetrau
Abstract
Nowadays, psychoacoustic analysis of a sound is often applied for quick quantification of its auditory perception. Such hearing-related quantities also referred to as psychoacoustic parameters are meant to be a good representation of the human auditory perception. Predictive models are available to estimate the perception of these quantities. However, calculated psychoacoustic parameters show a lack of accuracy when compared with subjective listening test results for complex and authentic sounds. This paper shows some deficiencies and strengths of conventional algorithms and offers a few ideas for improvement.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Nowadays, psychoacoustic analysis of a sound is often applied for quick quantification of its auditory perception. Such hearing-related quantities also referred to as psychoacoustic parameters are meant to be a good representation of the human auditory perception. Predictive models are available to estimate the perception of these quantities. However, calculated psychoacoustic parameters show a lack of accuracy when compared with subjective listening test results for complex and authentic sounds. This paper shows some deficiencies and strengths of conventional algorithms and offers a few ideas for improvement.
Key concepts: Psychoacoustics, Active listening, Computer science, Perception, Speech recognition, Representation (politics), Auditory perception, Algorithm