2012China Journal of Chinese Materia MedicaRequires access

Multi-channel analysis and comparison on absorption difference between paeoniflorin and Paeonia lactiflora extracts

CHEN Yan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference of the absorption difference between paeoniflorin monomer and Paeonia lactiflora extracts in rat intestinal canals by multi-channels. METHOD: The rat intestinal perfusion model was established. The intestinal perfusate, bile and plasma samples were collected, in combination of the intestinal enzymes incubation test and the partition coefficient determination, to conduct a multi-channel analysis and comparison on absorption difference between paeoniflorin and P. lactiflora extracts. RESULT: In the same concentration, permeability coefficient P(eff)* of paeoniflorin in the different intestinal segments of P. lactiflora extract higher than the monomer of paeoniflorin, especially in the jejunum and ileum intestinal segments (P < 0. 05). However, both paeoniflorin monomer and P. lactiflora extracts showed less P(eff)* in four intestinal segments, with the former ranging between 0. 209-0.290 and the latter 0.252-0.333. No paeoniflorin and its metabolin was determined in bile samples, plasma samples and intestinal enzymes incubation samples of paeoniflorin monomer and P. lactiflora extracts. CONCLUSION: Compared with the paeoniflorin monomer, P. lactiflora extract showed significantly increase in P(eff)*, which indicated that other ingredients in the extract can improve the absorption of paeoniflorin. However, due to the poor absorption of paeoniflorin, this effect fails to increase the concentration of paeoniflorin in bile and plasma within short period of time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference of the absorption difference between paeoniflorin monomer and Paeonia lactiflora extracts in rat intestinal canals by multi-channels. METHOD: The rat intestinal perfusion model was established. The intestinal perfusate, bile and plasma samples were collected, in combination of the intestinal enzymes incubation test and the partition coefficient determination, to conduct a multi-channel analysis and comparison on absorption difference between paeoniflorin and P. lactiflora extracts. RESULT: In the same concentration, permeability coefficient P(eff)* of paeoniflorin in the different intestinal segments of P. lactiflora extract higher than the monomer of paeoniflorin, especially in the jejunum and ileum intestinal segments (P < 0. 05). However, both paeoniflorin monomer and P. lactiflora extracts showed less P(eff)* in four intestinal segments, with the former ranging between 0. 209-0.290 and the latter 0.252-0.333. No paeoniflorin and its metabolin was determined in bile samples, plasma samples and intestinal enzymes incubation samples of paeoniflorin monomer and P. lactiflora extracts. CONCLUSION: Compared with the paeoniflorin monomer, P. lactiflora extract showed significantly increase in P(eff)*, which indicated that other ingredients in the extract can improve the absorption of paeoniflorin. However, due to the poor absorption of paeoniflorin, this effect fails to increase the concentration of paeoniflorin in bile and plasma within short period of time.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference of the absorption difference between paeoniflorin monomer and Paeonia lactiflora extracts in rat intestinal canals by multi-channels. METHOD: The rat intestinal perfusion model was established. The intestinal perfusate, bile and plasma samples were collected, in combination of the intestinal enzymes incubation test and the partition coefficient determination, to conduct a multi-channel analysis and comparison on absorption difference between paeoniflorin and P. lactiflora extracts. RESULT: In the same concentration, permeability coefficient P(eff)* of paeoniflorin in the different intestinal segments of P. lactiflora extract higher than the monomer of paeoniflorin, especially in the jejunum and ileum intestinal segments (P < 0. 05). However, both paeoniflorin monomer and P. lactiflora extracts showed less P(eff)* in four intestinal segments, with the former ranging between 0. 209-0.290 and the latter 0.252-0.333. No paeoniflorin and its metabolin was determined in bile samples, plasma samples and intestinal enzymes incubation samples of paeoniflorin monomer and P. lactiflora extracts. CONCLUSION: Compared with the paeoniflorin monomer, P. lactiflora extract showed significantly increase in P(eff)*, which indicated that other ingredients in the extract can improve the absorption of paeoniflorin. However, due to the poor absorption of paeoniflorin, this effect fails to increase the concentration of paeoniflorin in bile and plasma within short period of time.

Key concepts: Paeoniflorin, Paeonia lactiflora, Chromatography, Chemistry, Significant difference, High-performance liquid chromatography, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multi-channel analysis and comparison on absorption difference between paeoniflorin and Paeonia lactiflora extracts — Research Paper | ScholarLens