2002PubMedRequires access

[Experimental study on bacteriostasis of chitosan and sodium hyaluronate].

Zhaohui Tang, Chunlin Hou, Qingquan Chen

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect and coverage of bacteriostasis of chitosan and sodium hyaluronate. METHODS: Each of the five bacteria, Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, was cultivated for 33 tubes of broth culture. Leaving three tubes each group as control group, ploidy diluted concentration of high relative molecular weight chitosan, low relative molecular weight chitosan and sodium hyaluronate were added respectively in the broth culture. All the tubes were cultivated for 18 hours at 37 degrees C with homeothermia. Then the growth of bacteria was observed. RESULTS: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of high relative molecular weight chitosan were: Proteus mirabilis 0.031%, Escherichia coli 0.063%, Candida albicans 0.063%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.063%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.063%; and the MIC of low relative molecular weight chitosan were: Proteus mirabilis 0.125%, Escherichia coli 0.025%, Candida albicans 0.25%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.25%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.125%; bacteria grew well in each tube of sodium hyaluronate group and control group. CONCLUSION: The above results show that sodium hyaluronate has no bacteriostasis, while chitosan has bacteriostasis on broad spectrum and high relative molecular weigh: chitosan has stronger effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect and coverage of bacteriostasis of chitosan and sodium hyaluronate. METHODS: Each of the five bacteria, Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, was cultivated for 33 tubes of broth culture. Leaving three tubes each group as control group, ploidy diluted concentration of high relative molecular weight chitosan, low relative molecular weight chitosan and sodium hyaluronate were added respectively in the broth culture. All the tubes were cultivated for 18 hours at 37 degrees C with homeothermia. Then the growth of bacteria was observed. RESULTS: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of high relative molecular weight chitosan were: Proteus mirabilis 0.031%, Escherichia coli 0.063%, Candida albicans 0.063%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.063%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.063%; and the MIC of low relative molecular weight chitosan were: Proteus mirabilis 0.125%, Escherichia coli 0.025%, Candida albicans 0.25%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.25%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.125%; bacteria grew well in each tube of sodium hyaluronate group and control group. CONCLUSION: The above results show that sodium hyaluronate has no bacteriostasis, while chitosan has bacteriostasis on broad spectrum and high relative molecular weigh: chitosan has stronger effect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect and coverage of bacteriostasis of chitosan and sodium hyaluronate. METHODS: Each of the five bacteria, Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, was cultivated for 33 tubes of broth culture. Leaving three tubes each group as control group, ploidy diluted concentration of high relative molecular weight chitosan, low relative molecular weight chitosan and sodium hyaluronate were added respectively in the broth culture. All the tubes were cultivated for 18 hours at 37 degrees C with homeothermia. Then the growth of bacteria was observed. RESULTS: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of high relative molecular weight chitosan were: Proteus mirabilis 0.031%, Escherichia coli 0.063%, Candida albicans 0.063%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.063%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.063%; and the MIC of low relative molecular weight chitosan were: Proteus mirabilis 0.125%, Escherichia coli 0.025%, Candida albicans 0.25%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.25%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.125%; bacteria grew well in each tube of sodium hyaluronate group and control group. CONCLUSION: The above results show that sodium hyaluronate has no bacteriostasis, while chitosan has bacteriostasis on broad spectrum and high relative molecular weigh: chitosan has stronger effect.

Key concepts: Proteus mirabilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Chitosan, Candida albicans, Microbiology, Escherichia coli, Sodium hyaluronate, Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Experimental study on bacteriostasis of chitosan and sodium hyaluronate]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens