1993The Medical Journal of AustraliaRequires access

Autonomy and paternalism in medicine

Brian Pollard

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

The role of ethics in medical practice is now receiving close scrutiny, so it is timely that ethical concepts, such as autonomy and paternalism, be re-examined in their applied contexts. As neither autonomy nor paternalism has a current universally accepted meaning, their significance varies in both ethical and clinical discussion. Of the two, autonomy has moved further from its original moral context, to the extent that it often now signifies no more than a person's expressed intention. Paternalism, characterised as the antithesis of autonomy, is widely thought not to have any role in medicine. The transforming effects of illness, which may radically alter a person's decision making capacity, are commonly ignored.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The role of ethics in medical practice is now receiving close scrutiny, so it is timely that ethical concepts, such as autonomy and paternalism, be re-examined in their applied contexts. As neither autonomy nor paternalism has a current universally accepted meaning, their significance varies in both ethical and clinical discussion. Of the two, autonomy has moved further from its original moral context, to the extent that it often now signifies no more than a person's expressed intention. Paternalism, characterised as the antithesis of autonomy, is widely thought not to have any role in medicine. The transforming effects of illness, which may radically alter a person's decision making capacity, are commonly ignored.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The role of ethics in medical practice is now receiving close scrutiny, so it is timely that ethical concepts, such as autonomy and paternalism, be re-examined in their applied contexts. As neither autonomy nor paternalism has a current universally accepted meaning, their significance varies in both ethical and clinical discussion. Of the two, autonomy has moved further from its original moral context, to the extent that it often now signifies no more than a person's expressed intention. Paternalism, characterised as the antithesis of autonomy, is widely thought not to have any role in medicine. The transforming effects of illness, which may radically alter a person's decision making capacity, are commonly ignored.

Key concepts: Paternalism, Autonomy, Scrutiny, Context (archaeology), Meaning (existential), Personal autonomy, Psychology, Philosophy of medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Autonomy and paternalism in medicine — Research Paper | ScholarLens