Paternalismv. autonomy – are we barking up the wrong tree?
Peter Lepping, Tom Palmstierna, Bevinahalli Nanjegowda Raveesh
Abstract
Open-access reader
Peter Lepping, Tom Palmstierna, Bevinahalli Nanjegowda Raveesh
Abstract
Open-access reader
We explore whether we can reduce paternalism by increasing patient autonomy. We argue that autonomy should not have any automatic priority over other ethical values. Thus, balancing autonomy v. other ethical pillars and finding the optimal balance between the patient's wishes and those of other relevant stakeholders such as the patient's family has to be dynamic over time.
OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We explore whether we can reduce paternalism by increasing patient autonomy. We argue that autonomy should not have any automatic priority over other ethical values. Thus, balancing autonomy v. other ethical pillars and finding the optimal balance between the patient's wishes and those of other relevant stakeholders such as the patient's family has to be dynamic over time.
Key concepts: Paternalism, Autonomy, Balance (ability), Personal autonomy, Psychology, Social psychology, Law and economics, Law