1988•PubMedRequires access

Diazepam, flunitrazepam and midazolam for elective endoscopy--a comparative study.

Mohamad Said Maani Takrouri, Ala U. Toukan, Izdiad Z. Badran, Zuhair F Sbeih, N Hunjul

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

One hundred twenty patients undergoing elective endoscopies were studied. They were allocated into three groups and accordingly they received Diazepam, Flunitrazepam and Midazolam. The effect of these drugs on the task performance of the patient's memory, anxiety and sedation level were assessed using objective tests. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were also assessed. All observations were subjected to student's t-test and chi squared assessment. We concluded that there are no major differences between the three drugs in the dosage used. However, the Midazolam group showed faster recovery, more sedation, less pain on injection than the Diazepam group. As for the cardiovascular system, there was a tendency for hypotension and tachycardia in all groups. Patients in the Midazolam group had more amnesia as compared to the other groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One hundred twenty patients undergoing elective endoscopies were studied. They were allocated into three groups and accordingly they received Diazepam, Flunitrazepam and Midazolam. The effect of these drugs on the task performance of the patient's memory, anxiety and sedation level were assessed using objective tests. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were also assessed. All observations were subjected to student's t-test and chi squared assessment. We concluded that there are no major differences between the three drugs in the dosage used. However, the Midazolam group showed faster recovery, more sedation, less pain on injection than the Diazepam group. As for the cardiovascular system, there was a tendency for hypotension and tachycardia in all groups. Patients in the Midazolam group had more amnesia as compared to the other groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One hundred twenty patients undergoing elective endoscopies were studied. They were allocated into three groups and accordingly they received Diazepam, Flunitrazepam and Midazolam. The effect of these drugs on the task performance of the patient's memory, anxiety and sedation level were assessed using objective tests. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were also assessed. All observations were subjected to student's t-test and chi squared assessment. We concluded that there are no major differences between the three drugs in the dosage used. However, the Midazolam group showed faster recovery, more sedation, less pain on injection than the Diazepam group. As for the cardiovascular system, there was a tendency for hypotension and tachycardia in all groups. Patients in the Midazolam group had more amnesia as compared to the other groups.

Key concepts: Midazolam, Medicine, Sedation, Diazepam, Anesthesia, Flunitrazepam, Anterograde amnesia, Amnesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diazepam, flunitrazepam and midazolam for elective endoscopy--a comparative study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens