1984PubMedRequires access

A comparison of diazepam and midazolam as sedatives for minor oral surgery.

A M Skelly, M. J. Boscoe, Sheila Dawling, Anthony P. Adams

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Diazepam in propylene glycol (Valium, Roche) and midazolam (Hypnovel, Roche) were compared as sedatives in 40 patients undergoing minor oral surgery. Twenty patients received each drug. The cardiovascular effects, the acceptability of the drugs to patients and dentists and the incidence of anterograde amnesia and adverse venous sequelae were investigated. Serum benzodiazepine levels were measured and recovery studied by six psychomotor tests repeated over five hours. Both drugs provided safe and acceptable sedation. More amnesia was reported in the midazolam group and more adverse venous sequelae by the diazepam patients. The recovery tests showed that the time taken to return to pre-sedation scores varied with the tests used and there was no significant evidence of the midazolam group recovering more quickly. In particular, significant impairment of delayed memory recall persisted in both groups throughout the investigation period.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Diazepam in propylene glycol (Valium, Roche) and midazolam (Hypnovel, Roche) were compared as sedatives in 40 patients undergoing minor oral surgery. Twenty patients received each drug. The cardiovascular effects, the acceptability of the drugs to patients and dentists and the incidence of anterograde amnesia and adverse venous sequelae were investigated. Serum benzodiazepine levels were measured and recovery studied by six psychomotor tests repeated over five hours. Both drugs provided safe and acceptable sedation. More amnesia was reported in the midazolam group and more adverse venous sequelae by the diazepam patients. The recovery tests showed that the time taken to return to pre-sedation scores varied with the tests used and there was no significant evidence of the midazolam group recovering more quickly. In particular, significant impairment of delayed memory recall persisted in both groups throughout the investigation period.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Diazepam in propylene glycol (Valium, Roche) and midazolam (Hypnovel, Roche) were compared as sedatives in 40 patients undergoing minor oral surgery. Twenty patients received each drug. The cardiovascular effects, the acceptability of the drugs to patients and dentists and the incidence of anterograde amnesia and adverse venous sequelae were investigated. Serum benzodiazepine levels were measured and recovery studied by six psychomotor tests repeated over five hours. Both drugs provided safe and acceptable sedation. More amnesia was reported in the midazolam group and more adverse venous sequelae by the diazepam patients. The recovery tests showed that the time taken to return to pre-sedation scores varied with the tests used and there was no significant evidence of the midazolam group recovering more quickly. In particular, significant impairment of delayed memory recall persisted in both groups throughout the investigation period.

Key concepts: Medicine, Midazolam, Amnesia, Anesthesia, Diazepam, Sedation, Benzodiazepine, Anterograde amnesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of diazepam and midazolam as sedatives for minor oral surgery. — Research Paper | ScholarLens