1991•PubMedRequires access

Hysterosalpingography, pre- and postoperative laparoscopy in operative treatment of infertility.

Schnack Peen Ub, J Pelle, Erik Bostofte, I C Felding

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The benefit of routine hysterosalpingography (HSG) and pre- and postoperative laparoscopy in diagnosing and treating anatomical infertility was investigated in 115 women. The findings at HSG and laparoscopy were compared with the diagnoses obtained by laparotomy. Laparoscopy was significantly better than HSG in detecting adhesions. Both procedures were of equal value in assessing tubal pathology. Although HSG revealed additional findings in 5 per cent of cases, none of these needed operative correction. Postoperative laparoscopy, which was performed in 70 patients, did not affect the incidence of either intra- or extra-uterine pregnancy. It is concluded that all patients should be offered diagnostic laparoscopy. HSG and second-look laparoscopy should not be used routinely.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The benefit of routine hysterosalpingography (HSG) and pre- and postoperative laparoscopy in diagnosing and treating anatomical infertility was investigated in 115 women. The findings at HSG and laparoscopy were compared with the diagnoses obtained by laparotomy. Laparoscopy was significantly better than HSG in detecting adhesions. Both procedures were of equal value in assessing tubal pathology. Although HSG revealed additional findings in 5 per cent of cases, none of these needed operative correction. Postoperative laparoscopy, which was performed in 70 patients, did not affect the incidence of either intra- or extra-uterine pregnancy. It is concluded that all patients should be offered diagnostic laparoscopy. HSG and second-look laparoscopy should not be used routinely.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The benefit of routine hysterosalpingography (HSG) and pre- and postoperative laparoscopy in diagnosing and treating anatomical infertility was investigated in 115 women. The findings at HSG and laparoscopy were compared with the diagnoses obtained by laparotomy. Laparoscopy was significantly better than HSG in detecting adhesions. Both procedures were of equal value in assessing tubal pathology. Although HSG revealed additional findings in 5 per cent of cases, none of these needed operative correction. Postoperative laparoscopy, which was performed in 70 patients, did not affect the incidence of either intra- or extra-uterine pregnancy. It is concluded that all patients should be offered diagnostic laparoscopy. HSG and second-look laparoscopy should not be used routinely.

Key concepts: Hysterosalpingography, Laparoscopy, Medicine, Infertility, Laparotomy, Endoscopy, Female infertility, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hysterosalpingography, pre- and postoperative laparoscopy in operative treatment of infertility. — Research Paper | ScholarLens