1981PubMedRequires access

[Early changes in acute pulmonary embolism as seen in the scintigram and on x-ray film (author's transl)].

H. Creutzig, S. Gonda, Daniel Saure

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism is among the most frequent acute pulmonary diseases. Non-invasive radiological diagnosis can make use of the x-ray film of the chest and of the various forms of scintigraphy of the lungs. The authors compared the non-invasive approaches in 328 patients clinically suspected of acute pulmonary embolism. Compared with computerized ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, evaluation of perfusion scintigraphy shows an "over-diagnostis" of pulmonary embolism by 60% (148) "detected cases" in 92 patients). 16% of all patients with no abnormal findings in their x-ray film had acute pulmonary embolism, in another 17% we found perfusion defects pointing towards embolism, associated with a disturbance of ventilation. To exclude pulmonary embolism, performance of perfusion scintigraphy will suffice; studies of ventilation will be mandatory to establish proof that embolism is present. Indirect roentgenographic signs are not helpful in arriving at the correct diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pulmonary embolism is among the most frequent acute pulmonary diseases. Non-invasive radiological diagnosis can make use of the x-ray film of the chest and of the various forms of scintigraphy of the lungs. The authors compared the non-invasive approaches in 328 patients clinically suspected of acute pulmonary embolism. Compared with computerized ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, evaluation of perfusion scintigraphy shows an "over-diagnostis" of pulmonary embolism by 60% (148) "detected cases" in 92 patients). 16% of all patients with no abnormal findings in their x-ray film had acute pulmonary embolism, in another 17% we found perfusion defects pointing towards embolism, associated with a disturbance of ventilation. To exclude pulmonary embolism, performance of perfusion scintigraphy will suffice; studies of ventilation will be mandatory to establish proof that embolism is present. Indirect roentgenographic signs are not helpful in arriving at the correct diagnosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pulmonary embolism is among the most frequent acute pulmonary diseases. Non-invasive radiological diagnosis can make use of the x-ray film of the chest and of the various forms of scintigraphy of the lungs. The authors compared the non-invasive approaches in 328 patients clinically suspected of acute pulmonary embolism. Compared with computerized ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, evaluation of perfusion scintigraphy shows an "over-diagnostis" of pulmonary embolism by 60% (148) "detected cases" in 92 patients). 16% of all patients with no abnormal findings in their x-ray film had acute pulmonary embolism, in another 17% we found perfusion defects pointing towards embolism, associated with a disturbance of ventilation. To exclude pulmonary embolism, performance of perfusion scintigraphy will suffice; studies of ventilation will be mandatory to establish proof that embolism is present. Indirect roentgenographic signs are not helpful in arriving at the correct diagnosis.

Key concepts: Pulmonary embolism, Medicine, Scintigraphy, Perfusion, Radiology, Embolism, Ventilation (architecture), Lung

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Early changes in acute pulmonary embolism as seen in the scintigram and on x-ray film (author's transl)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens