2010•PubMedRequires access

[Intravascular ultrasound evaluation on the efficacy of national made Firebird stents comparing with Cypher stents].

Rongpin Du, Zhang Ry, Zhu Zb, Q Zhang, Hu Jiang, Zhang Js, Wel Feng Shen

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to compare the effects on neointimal hyperplasia inhibition between national made Firebird stents and Cypher stents in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: From May 2003 to March 2007, 215 patients with 317 native lesions received either Firebird stent (147 lesions of 108 patients, Firebird group) or Cypher stent implantation (138 lesions of 107 patients, Cypher group). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS were performed at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics between the two groups were similar, but post procedural minimal lumen diameter was significantly larger in Firebird group than that in Cypher group [(2.88 +/- 0.43) mm vs. (2.78 +/- 0.33) mm, P < 0.05]. follow-up QCA results showed that in-stent late loss [(0.17 +/- 0.29) mm vs. (0.16 +/- 0.27) mm, P > 0.05] and in-segment late loss [(0.18 +/- 0.36) mm vs. (0.20 +/- 0.32) mm, P > 0.05] was similar between Firebird group and Cypher group, while stent cross sectional area (CSA) [(6.99 +/- 2.25) mm(2) vs. (6.46 +/- 1.71) mm(2), P < 0.05], lumen CSA [(6.89 +/- 2.30) mm(2) vs. (6.36 +/- 1.73) mm(2), P < 0.05], stent volume [(162.5 +/- 68.9) m(3) vs. (140.8 +/- 57.9) mm(3), P < 0.01], lumen volume [(160.4 +/- 69.5) mm(3) vs. (138.6 +/- 57.6) mm(3), P < 0.01] and minimal stent CSA [(5.40 +/- 1.85) mm(2) vs. (4.92 +/- 1.43) mm(2), P < 0.05] were larger in Firebird group than those in Cypher group. IVUS analysis showed that there was no significant difference in neointimal hyperplasia volume [(2.09 +/- 5.46) mm(3) vs. (2.23 +/- 6.50) mm(3), P > 0.05] and percentage of volume obstruction [(1.68 +/- 5.84)% vs. (1.59 +/- 4.10)%, P > 0.05] between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Implantation of Firebird stent was associated with low restenosis rate and both Firebird and Cypher stents equally and effectively inhibited neointimal hyperplasia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to compare the effects on neointimal hyperplasia inhibition between national made Firebird stents and Cypher stents in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: From May 2003 to March 2007, 215 patients with 317 native lesions received either Firebird stent (147 lesions of 108 patients, Firebird group) or Cypher stent implantation (138 lesions of 107 patients, Cypher group). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS were performed at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics between the two groups were similar, but post procedural minimal lumen diameter was significantly larger in Firebird group than that in Cypher group [(2.88 +/- 0.43) mm vs. (2.78 +/- 0.33) mm, P < 0.05]. follow-up QCA results showed that in-stent late loss [(0.17 +/- 0.29) mm vs. (0.16 +/- 0.27) mm, P > 0.05] and in-segment late loss [(0.18 +/- 0.36) mm vs. (0.20 +/- 0.32) mm, P > 0.05] was similar between Firebird group and Cypher group, while stent cross sectional area (CSA) [(6.99 +/- 2.25) mm(2) vs. (6.46 +/- 1.71) mm(2), P < 0.05], lumen CSA [(6.89 +/- 2.30) mm(2) vs. (6.36 +/- 1.73) mm(2), P < 0.05], stent volume [(162.5 +/- 68.9) m(3) vs. (140.8 +/- 57.9) mm(3), P < 0.01], lumen volume [(160.4 +/- 69.5) mm(3) vs. (138.6 +/- 57.6) mm(3), P < 0.01] and minimal stent CSA [(5.40 +/- 1.85) mm(2) vs. (4.92 +/- 1.43) mm(2), P < 0.05] were larger in Firebird group than those in Cypher group. IVUS analysis showed that there was no significant difference in neointimal hyperplasia volume [(2.09 +/- 5.46) mm(3) vs. (2.23 +/- 6.50) mm(3), P > 0.05] and percentage of volume obstruction [(1.68 +/- 5.84)% vs. (1.59 +/- 4.10)%, P > 0.05] between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Implantation of Firebird stent was associated with low restenosis rate and both Firebird and Cypher stents equally and effectively inhibited neointimal hyperplasia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to compare the effects on neointimal hyperplasia inhibition between national made Firebird stents and Cypher stents in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: From May 2003 to March 2007, 215 patients with 317 native lesions received either Firebird stent (147 lesions of 108 patients, Firebird group) or Cypher stent implantation (138 lesions of 107 patients, Cypher group). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS were performed at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics between the two groups were similar, but post procedural minimal lumen diameter was significantly larger in Firebird group than that in Cypher group [(2.88 +/- 0.43) mm vs. (2.78 +/- 0.33) mm, P < 0.05]. follow-up QCA results showed that in-stent late loss [(0.17 +/- 0.29) mm vs. (0.16 +/- 0.27) mm, P > 0.05] and in-segment late loss [(0.18 +/- 0.36) mm vs. (0.20 +/- 0.32) mm, P > 0.05] was similar between Firebird group and Cypher group, while stent cross sectional area (CSA) [(6.99 +/- 2.25) mm(2) vs. (6.46 +/- 1.71) mm(2), P < 0.05], lumen CSA [(6.89 +/- 2.30) mm(2) vs. (6.36 +/- 1.73) mm(2), P < 0.05], stent volume [(162.5 +/- 68.9) m(3) vs. (140.8 +/- 57.9) mm(3), P < 0.01], lumen volume [(160.4 +/- 69.5) mm(3) vs. (138.6 +/- 57.6) mm(3), P < 0.01] and minimal stent CSA [(5.40 +/- 1.85) mm(2) vs. (4.92 +/- 1.43) mm(2), P < 0.05] were larger in Firebird group than those in Cypher group. IVUS analysis showed that there was no significant difference in neointimal hyperplasia volume [(2.09 +/- 5.46) mm(3) vs. (2.23 +/- 6.50) mm(3), P > 0.05] and percentage of volume obstruction [(1.68 +/- 5.84)% vs. (1.59 +/- 4.10)%, P > 0.05] between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Implantation of Firebird stent was associated with low restenosis rate and both Firebird and Cypher stents equally and effectively inhibited neointimal hyperplasia.

Key concepts: Intravascular ultrasound, Medicine, Restenosis, Neointimal hyperplasia, Stent, Lumen (anatomy), Intimal hyperplasia, Artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Intravascular ultrasound evaluation on the efficacy of national made Firebird stents comparing with Cypher stents]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens