Role of Hydrolyzed Formulas in Nutritional Allergy Prevention in Infants
UWE BLECKER
Abstract
UWE BLECKER
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, more and more discussions have arisen with regard to the role of (partially) hydrolyzed formulas as standard feedings for infants with a high risk to have allergy. METHODS: This review is based on an extensive overview of the literature dealing with the subjects of allergy prevention and hydrolyzed formulas. RESULTS: Although breast-feeding should receive absolute priority in the nutrition of infants, the existence of artificial milk formulas as an addition to or replacement of breast milk is a necessity. In high-risk infants with a family history of allergy, we might consider a hypoallergenic formula instead of the classical start formulas to reduce the risk of allergy. From a nutritional point of view, these formulas should only be hydrolyzed as much as necessary. On the other hand, for the treatment of food allergies, the peptides of the semi-elementary infant formulas should be as short as possible. This can, however, have an impact on the nutritional value of the formula. Therefore, a difference is made between partial and complete hydrolysates. CONCLUSION: While a firm recommendation is not yet possible, physicians might consider partial hydrolysate formulas in high-risk infants if parents can afford the higher-cost option.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, more and more discussions have arisen with regard to the role of (partially) hydrolyzed formulas as standard feedings for infants with a high risk to have allergy. METHODS: This review is based on an extensive overview of the literature dealing with the subjects of allergy prevention and hydrolyzed formulas. RESULTS: Although breast-feeding should receive absolute priority in the nutrition of infants, the existence of artificial milk formulas as an addition to or replacement of breast milk is a necessity. In high-risk infants with a family history of allergy, we might consider a hypoallergenic formula instead of the classical start formulas to reduce the risk of allergy. From a nutritional point of view, these formulas should only be hydrolyzed as much as necessary. On the other hand, for the treatment of food allergies, the peptides of the semi-elementary infant formulas should be as short as possible. This can, however, have an impact on the nutritional value of the formula. Therefore, a difference is made between partial and complete hydrolysates. CONCLUSION: While a firm recommendation is not yet possible, physicians might consider partial hydrolysate formulas in high-risk infants if parents can afford the higher-cost option.
Key concepts: Hypoallergenic, Medicine, Infant formula, Allergy, Food allergy, Milk allergy, Hydrolysate, Breast milk