1984•PubMedRequires access

[Comparative estimation of the limitations of mammography and echography in senologic practice].

Murat Jl, Yves Grumbach, Brigitte Baratte, P Leflot

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Mammography and breast ultrasonography are complementary examinations. The combination of the two examinations can provide an accurate diagnosis, which mammography alone is unable to do. Ultrasonography is particularly important in the examination of dense breasts, especially for the visualization of sonolucent or hypoechogenic formations. However, ultrasonography should not be performed alone, as it is unable to visualize microcalcifications. It can not be used as a screening test and it would be a professional error to perform only a clinical examination and ultrasonography, as a large number of diagnoses would be missed. Two essential points should be stressed: 30% of carcinomas have microcalcifications; amongst these 30%, many lesions are small and impalpable and they may not be seen on ultrasonography in a fatty breast. 40% of occult cancers are detected by the microcalcifications identified on mammography, which remains the key to breast investigations. Ultrasonography compensates for some of the deficiencies of radiography and can be very useful in dense breasts, in cystic or hypoechogenic structures. It can also be used to guide aspiration biopsy of non palpable lesions and for the pre-operative localization of impalpable lesions with abnormal echostructure, which are not visible on mammography.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mammography and breast ultrasonography are complementary examinations. The combination of the two examinations can provide an accurate diagnosis, which mammography alone is unable to do. Ultrasonography is particularly important in the examination of dense breasts, especially for the visualization of sonolucent or hypoechogenic formations. However, ultrasonography should not be performed alone, as it is unable to visualize microcalcifications. It can not be used as a screening test and it would be a professional error to perform only a clinical examination and ultrasonography, as a large number of diagnoses would be missed. Two essential points should be stressed: 30% of carcinomas have microcalcifications; amongst these 30%, many lesions are small and impalpable and they may not be seen on ultrasonography in a fatty breast. 40% of occult cancers are detected by the microcalcifications identified on mammography, which remains the key to breast investigations. Ultrasonography compensates for some of the deficiencies of radiography and can be very useful in dense breasts, in cystic or hypoechogenic structures. It can also be used to guide aspiration biopsy of non palpable lesions and for the pre-operative localization of impalpable lesions with abnormal echostructure, which are not visible on mammography.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mammography and breast ultrasonography are complementary examinations. The combination of the two examinations can provide an accurate diagnosis, which mammography alone is unable to do. Ultrasonography is particularly important in the examination of dense breasts, especially for the visualization of sonolucent or hypoechogenic formations. However, ultrasonography should not be performed alone, as it is unable to visualize microcalcifications. It can not be used as a screening test and it would be a professional error to perform only a clinical examination and ultrasonography, as a large number of diagnoses would be missed. Two essential points should be stressed: 30% of carcinomas have microcalcifications; amongst these 30%, many lesions are small and impalpable and they may not be seen on ultrasonography in a fatty breast. 40% of occult cancers are detected by the microcalcifications identified on mammography, which remains the key to breast investigations. Ultrasonography compensates for some of the deficiencies of radiography and can be very useful in dense breasts, in cystic or hypoechogenic structures. It can also be used to guide aspiration biopsy of non palpable lesions and for the pre-operative localization of impalpable lesions with abnormal echostructure, which are not visible on mammography.

Key concepts: Mammography, Medicine, Ultrasonography, Radiology, Occult, Radiography, Palpation, Medical diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparative estimation of the limitations of mammography and echography in senologic practice]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens