Serum levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) in lung cancer.
Wojciech Naumnik, E Chyczewska, Oksana Kovalchuk, J Tałałaj, Tomasz Iżycki, B Panek
Abstract
Wojciech Naumnik, E Chyczewska, Oksana Kovalchuk, J Tałałaj, Tomasz Iżycki, B Panek
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) during chemotherapy of lung cancer in relation to the histological type of the tumor, clinical stage, response to therapy and time survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Serum levels of IL-18 and sIL-2R were determined in 73 patients (62 males; mean age 64 years; 41 with non-small cell lung cancer-NSCLC, 32 with small cell lung cancer-SCLC); 12 healthy subjects served as controls. To determine IL-18 serum concentrations (Elisa), venous blood samples were collected from each patient before and after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean serum IL-18 level in all patients with lung cancer was significantly higher compared with healthy volunteers (p = 0.0001; NSCLC vs control p = 0.0001; SCLC vs control p = 0.004). In NSCLC group with stage IV the mean IL-18 level was significantly higher than those with stage IIIB (p = 0.04). Regarding tumor stage and response to therapy, no significant differences in IL-18 were observed. Using cut-off serum IL-18 concentration of 319.6 pg/ml, the prognoses of the two groups were different, but it was not statistically significant. The serum levels of sIL-2R in NSCLC patients were significantly higher than in controls (p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in serum sIL-2R levels in relation to clinical stage of lung cancer and response to therapy. The cut-off value between high and low serum sIL-2R concentration was defined as 582.27 U/ml. The difference in survival rate between the high and low sIL-2R groups was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IL-18 and sIL-2R levels can be useful in clinical practice, but their practical significance needs further studies.
OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) during chemotherapy of lung cancer in relation to the histological type of the tumor, clinical stage, response to therapy and time survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Serum levels of IL-18 and sIL-2R were determined in 73 patients (62 males; mean age 64 years; 41 with non-small cell lung cancer-NSCLC, 32 with small cell lung cancer-SCLC); 12 healthy subjects served as controls. To determine IL-18 serum concentrations (Elisa), venous blood samples were collected from each patient before and after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean serum IL-18 level in all patients with lung cancer was significantly higher compared with healthy volunteers (p = 0.0001; NSCLC vs control p = 0.0001; SCLC vs control p = 0.004). In NSCLC group with stage IV the mean IL-18 level was significantly higher than those with stage IIIB (p = 0.04). Regarding tumor stage and response to therapy, no significant differences in IL-18 were observed. Using cut-off serum IL-18 concentration of 319.6 pg/ml, the prognoses of the two groups were different, but it was not statistically significant. The serum levels of sIL-2R in NSCLC patients were significantly higher than in controls (p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in serum sIL-2R levels in relation to clinical stage of lung cancer and response to therapy. The cut-off value between high and low serum sIL-2R concentration was defined as 582.27 U/ml. The difference in survival rate between the high and low sIL-2R groups was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IL-18 and sIL-2R levels can be useful in clinical practice, but their practical significance needs further studies.
Key concepts: Lung cancer, Medicine, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Chemotherapy, Stage (stratigraphy), Interleukin 2, Venous blood