2009Annals of King Edward Medical UniversityOpen access

Review of the Pathologic Diagnoses of Appendectomy Specimens

Imrana Zulfikar, Tariq Wahab Khanzada, Champa Sushel, Abdul Samad

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

Objective:   The purpose of this study is to see the pattern of various histopathological diagnoses in appendectomy specimens. Setting:   This retrospective study carried out at Isra University Hospital, Hyderabad and three main hospitals of Hyderabad over a period of two years starting from March 2006 to February 2008. Methods :  Hospital records of all patients who were diagnosed as acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy (either open or laparoscopic) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients' age, sex operative findings and histopathology reports were noted. Histopathology reports were analyzed according to the diagnosis. Results:   Hospital records of 323 patients who were diagnosed as acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy (either open or laparoscopic) were reviewed. 86.3% specimens revealed findings of acute appendicitis, 10.8% were normal, while 3% has tuberculosis, 1.5% had Meckle diverticulitis and 0.6% each of adenocarcinoma and Carcinoid tumour. Among acute appendicitis, lymphoid hyperplasia was the predominant finding seen in 57.8% of cases. Conclusion:   Other than acute inflammation, routine histopathological examination of the appendix yields important clinical information like benign and malignant tumours. All appendectomy specimen should be sent for routine histopathological examination so as not to other unusual or co-existing pathologies. Key words:   Appendectomy, histopathology, acute appendicitis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:   The purpose of this study is to see the pattern of various histopathological diagnoses in appendectomy specimens. Setting:   This retrospective study carried out at Isra University Hospital, Hyderabad and three main hospitals of Hyderabad over a period of two years starting from March 2006 to February 2008. Methods :  Hospital records of all patients who were diagnosed as acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy (either open or laparoscopic) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients' age, sex operative findings and histopathology reports were noted. Histopathology reports were analyzed according to the diagnosis. Results:   Hospital records of 323 patients who were diagnosed as acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy (either open or laparoscopic) were reviewed. 86.3% specimens revealed findings of acute appendicitis, 10.8% were normal, while 3% has tuberculosis, 1.5% had Meckle diverticulitis and 0.6% each of adenocarcinoma and Carcinoid tumour. Among acute appendicitis, lymphoid hyperplasia was the predominant finding seen in 57.8% of cases. Conclusion:   Other than acute inflammation, routine histopathological examination of the appendix yields important clinical information like benign and malignant tumours. All appendectomy specimen should be sent for routine histopathological examination so as not to other unusual or co-existing pathologies. Key words:   Appendectomy, histopathology, acute appendicitis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:   The purpose of this study is to see the pattern of various histopathological diagnoses in appendectomy specimens. Setting:   This retrospective study carried out at Isra University Hospital, Hyderabad and three main hospitals of Hyderabad over a period of two years starting from March 2006 to February 2008. Methods :  Hospital records of all patients who were diagnosed as acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy (either open or laparoscopic) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients' age, sex operative findings and histopathology reports were noted. Histopathology reports were analyzed according to the diagnosis. Results:   Hospital records of 323 patients who were diagnosed as acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy (either open or laparoscopic) were reviewed. 86.3% specimens revealed findings of acute appendicitis, 10.8% were normal, while 3% has tuberculosis, 1.5% had Meckle diverticulitis and 0.6% each of adenocarcinoma and Carcinoid tumour. Among acute appendicitis, lymphoid hyperplasia was the predominant finding seen in 57.8% of cases. Conclusion:   Other than acute inflammation, routine histopathological examination of the appendix yields important clinical information like benign and malignant tumours. All appendectomy specimen should be sent for routine histopathological examination so as not to other unusual or co-existing pathologies. Key words:   Appendectomy, histopathology, acute appendicitis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Histopathology, Appendix, Appendicitis, Medical diagnosis, Acute appendicitis, General surgery, Histopathological examination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Review of the Pathologic Diagnoses of Appendectomy Specimens — Research Paper | ScholarLens