2019Tropical Journal of Pathology and MicrobiologyOpen access

Importance of routine histopathological examination in appendectomy specimens

Roopmala Murugan, Thamilselvi R., Saranya Balasubramanian

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency. It is a clinical entity with an ongoing diagnostic challenge. Histopathological examinations are the gold standard for the final diagnosis, which has revealed much unusual, unexpected serious underlying pathology. This study is to analyze the histopathological patterns in appendectomy specimens and to establish the role and importance of histopathological examination in diagnosing various serious incidental pathologies. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study comprising of 181 patients, carried out at VMKVMCH, Department of Pathology, over a period of 2 years from September 2017 to August 2019. Clinical data of patients were collected for all the appendectomy specimens received at the pathology department and histopathology slides were reviewed. Results: A total of 181 cases were analyzed. Patients’ age ranged from 3 to 77 years. The predominant appendectomy finding was acute appendicitis 86 cases (47.51%) followed by chronic appendicitis 58 cases (32.04%). Among the unusual findings, eosinophilic appendicitis was the commonest 4 cases (2.20%), mucocele, carcinoid and parasite 1 case (0.55%) each respectively. Conclusion: Although most of the cases were diagnosed as acute appendicitis, a few of the essential incidental pathologies were missed out pre-operatively and intra-operatively. Hence these serious incidental diagnoses undeniably support the fact that all appendectomy specimens should be sent routinely for histopathological examination, which is not followed in many hospitals in India.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency. It is a clinical entity with an ongoing diagnostic challenge. Histopathological examinations are the gold standard for the final diagnosis, which has revealed much unusual, unexpected serious underlying pathology. This study is to analyze the histopathological patterns in appendectomy specimens and to establish the role and importance of histopathological examination in diagnosing various serious incidental pathologies. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study comprising of 181 patients, carried out at VMKVMCH, Department of Pathology, over a period of 2 years from September 2017 to August 2019. Clinical data of patients were collected for all the appendectomy specimens received at the pathology department and histopathology slides were reviewed. Results: A total of 181 cases were analyzed. Patients’ age ranged from 3 to 77 years. The predominant appendectomy finding was acute appendicitis 86 cases (47.51%) followed by chronic appendicitis 58 cases (32.04%). Among the unusual findings, eosinophilic appendicitis was the commonest 4 cases (2.20%), mucocele, carcinoid and parasite 1 case (0.55%) each respectively. Conclusion: Although most of the cases were diagnosed as acute appendicitis, a few of the essential incidental pathologies were missed out pre-operatively and intra-operatively. Hence these serious incidental diagnoses undeniably support the fact that all appendectomy specimens should be sent routinely for histopathological examination, which is not followed in many hospitals in India.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency. It is a clinical entity with an ongoing diagnostic challenge. Histopathological examinations are the gold standard for the final diagnosis, which has revealed much unusual, unexpected serious underlying pathology. This study is to analyze the histopathological patterns in appendectomy specimens and to establish the role and importance of histopathological examination in diagnosing various serious incidental pathologies. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study comprising of 181 patients, carried out at VMKVMCH, Department of Pathology, over a period of 2 years from September 2017 to August 2019. Clinical data of patients were collected for all the appendectomy specimens received at the pathology department and histopathology slides were reviewed. Results: A total of 181 cases were analyzed. Patients’ age ranged from 3 to 77 years. The predominant appendectomy finding was acute appendicitis 86 cases (47.51%) followed by chronic appendicitis 58 cases (32.04%). Among the unusual findings, eosinophilic appendicitis was the commonest 4 cases (2.20%), mucocele, carcinoid and parasite 1 case (0.55%) each respectively. Conclusion: Although most of the cases were diagnosed as acute appendicitis, a few of the essential incidental pathologies were missed out pre-operatively and intra-operatively. Hence these serious incidental diagnoses undeniably support the fact that all appendectomy specimens should be sent routinely for histopathological examination, which is not followed in many hospitals in India.

Key concepts: Medicine, Histopathology, Appendicitis, Histopathological examination, Appendix, Gold standard (test), Mucocele, Medical diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Importance of routine histopathological examination in appendectomy specimens — Research Paper | ScholarLens