1994•PubMedRequires access

[Treatment of tumor pain with flupirtine. Results of a double-blind study versus tramadol].

V Lüben, Hermann Lothar Muller, Michael Lobisch, R Wörz

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: In a multicentric double-blind trial, flupirtine was compared with tramadol in the treatment of cancer pain. METHODS: Over a period of four weeks, 4 (-6) capsules containing either 100 mg flupirtine (n = 35) or 50 mg tramadol (n = 36) were taken daily in accordance with a fixed time schedule. Severity of pain was scored on a weekly basis using a five-stage verbal scale. RESULTS: Initially comparable in the two groups, pain was more markedly reduced after four weeks of treatment with flupirtine than after tramadol, the need for additional analgesic drugs also being less in the flupirtine group. The final general assessment by the attending doctors of the results achieved was "good" to "very good" in 63% of the patients on flupirtine, and in 46% of those on tramadol. Undesired effects were observed in 6% of the flupirtine patients and in 19% of those taking tramadol.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

STUDY DESIGN: In a multicentric double-blind trial, flupirtine was compared with tramadol in the treatment of cancer pain. METHODS: Over a period of four weeks, 4 (-6) capsules containing either 100 mg flupirtine (n = 35) or 50 mg tramadol (n = 36) were taken daily in accordance with a fixed time schedule. Severity of pain was scored on a weekly basis using a five-stage verbal scale. RESULTS: Initially comparable in the two groups, pain was more markedly reduced after four weeks of treatment with flupirtine than after tramadol, the need for additional analgesic drugs also being less in the flupirtine group. The final general assessment by the attending doctors of the results achieved was "good" to "very good" in 63% of the patients on flupirtine, and in 46% of those on tramadol. Undesired effects were observed in 6% of the flupirtine patients and in 19% of those taking tramadol.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

STUDY DESIGN: In a multicentric double-blind trial, flupirtine was compared with tramadol in the treatment of cancer pain. METHODS: Over a period of four weeks, 4 (-6) capsules containing either 100 mg flupirtine (n = 35) or 50 mg tramadol (n = 36) were taken daily in accordance with a fixed time schedule. Severity of pain was scored on a weekly basis using a five-stage verbal scale. RESULTS: Initially comparable in the two groups, pain was more markedly reduced after four weeks of treatment with flupirtine than after tramadol, the need for additional analgesic drugs also being less in the flupirtine group. The final general assessment by the attending doctors of the results achieved was "good" to "very good" in 63% of the patients on flupirtine, and in 46% of those on tramadol. Undesired effects were observed in 6% of the flupirtine patients and in 19% of those taking tramadol.

Key concepts: Tramadol, Medicine, Analgesic, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Treatment of tumor pain with flupirtine. Results of a double-blind study versus tramadol]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens